The paradox of Sarawak’s upcoming election campaign lies in the dependency of PBB on Umno and Umno on PBB, or indeed on any subordinate Sarawakian BN party that can deliver thirtysomething parliamentary seats to keep Umno in power.
Umno needs Sarawakian BN seats to stay in power, to keep raking in the money. RM40 billion for a Mass Rail Transit mega-project, RM5 billion for a 100-storey mega-tower in a congested part of KL, RM12.5 billion for PKFZ mega-blackhole, RM7.3 billion for the Bakun white elephant, the sums available for “leakage” are dizzying.
You can see in your mind’s eye, the smiling fat-cat licking his pink lips, at the thought of all the handbags he will buy for his scary wife. You can imagine the dazzle of diamonds encrusting the soles of her shoes.
In return for power at federal level, and 95% of oil royalties, Umno has left Taib and PBB to do anything they want in Sarawak – and Taib has obliged, indulging in a 30 year orgy of asset-stripping.
But here is the paradox: during the campaign, PBB will still preach that a vote for the DAP or PKR is a vote for ‘Orang Malaya’, for so-called ‘peninsular parties’. It is a tribute to Taib’s ability to divide and rule, and to keep so many Sarawakians poor and semi-literate, that many Sarawakians still believe him and will vote for BN.
And here is another paradox: some peninsular Malaysians, angry that Sarawakians and Sabahans voted overwhelmingly for BN in 2008, allowing BN to cling to power, call us “stupid” and “hopeless”.
They are happy to complain, but will not lift a finger to help remove Taib from power. And therefore they will not be surprised if they do not see the electoral result they hope for.
Showing concern for Sarawakians
There are notable exceptions among the ‘Orang Malaya’.
Suaram, the Center for Orang Asli Concerns, the Women’s Aid Organisation, the Women’s Centre for Change, the Bar Council and NGOs in the Penan Support Group have worked to highlight the suffering of Sarawakian girls raped by loggers.
The Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Halls have launched a donation drive to build two pre-schools in Penan villages in middle Baram.
The resourceful Democracy4Now mavericks have traveled tirelessly to remote hamlets in Sarawak to register voters in an effort to empower them. Malaysian Election Observers Net (MEO-Net) have shown tenacity in trying to preserve the democratic potential of one man, one vote.
Journalists like sacked RTM producer Zhou Z Lam, Malaysiakini’s Joseph Sipalan, Mariam Mokhtar and Wong Teck Chi, and the Nut Graph’s Gan Pei Ling, Jacqueline Ann Surin and Ding Jo Ann, and others from Malaysia Today and Free Malaysia Today, have turned the fickle attention of all Malaysians on injustice in Sarawak, at least for a while.
The state governments of Penang, under the DAP, and Selangor, under PKR, have also pooled funds to alleviate the hardship of Penans in middle and upper Baram, caused by the plague of loggers released by Taib.
All talk and no action
But there are still those bloggers and internet commentators who refuse to take concrete steps to support Sarawakians’ efforts to improve their government. These ‘Orang Malaya’ are all talk and no action. They sneer that Sarawakians are ignorant and ‘deserve the government’ we have, and ‘should not complain’ when the BN government vandalises our state.
It is true enough that many Sarawakians lack awareness, and many are easily bought over come voting time. It is also true, though, that Taib’s firm grip on the state for three decades has been made possible only by the overwhelming might of Umno and successive federal BN governments.
These BN governments have been voted into power in every single election since 1955, thanks to the perennial support of peninsular Malaysians. We remember how Mahathir, and even Abdullah Badawi, won landslide elections in the past.
But it is not too late for us Sarawakians to learn from the mistakes of our past, as well as those of peninsular Malaysians. We must start with working together to remove the dictatorship of Umno and PBB, and the tyranny of blinkered racial politics.
Pakatan Rakyat needs to invest in Sarawak, both politically and economically, and put its money where its mouth is.
All Malaysians must come together to work for justice in Sarawak, both during the state polls, as well as afterwards. Nation building does not only happen during general elections.
Pakatan Rakyat must promise, and deliver, transparent and equitable use of development funds in Sabah and Sarawak. There must be an end to the lopsided use of natural resources: oil royalties must be returned to these two poor states.
The current neo-colonial relationship between west and east brings dishonour and shame to all parties: peninsular Malaysians, Sabahans and Sarawakians.
Malaysians have turned their eyes away from the horror of corruption and poverty in Sabah and Sarawak for too long.
Whenever I am troubled by this neglect, I am reminded of a short story by the great Chinese writer Lu Xun, called “New Year’s Sacrifice”. The story has been translated into English by Julia Lovell, in The Real Story of Ah-Q and Other Tales of China.
In Lu Xun’s tale, a maidservant, known only as ‘Xianglin’s wife’, has been widowed twice. Therefore, she is considered to bring bad luck to those around her. She gains sympathy initially when she tells her fellow villagers, again and again, the story of how she lost her three year old son, how he had been taken and killed by wolves.
Part of the story is reproduced below:
Her story certainly had an impact on those who heard it. Men would walk awkwardly away, the smirk fading from their faces, while women exchanged their looks of contempt for sympathetic profusions of tears. Some old women – those who hadn’t heard her recitation about town – would seek her out specially to hear her tragic story. When she broke into sobs, their own tears, ready at the corners of their eyes, would also gush out; then, with a sigh, they would leave, perfectly satisfied and still discussing it animatedly among themselves.
Over and over she repeated it, gathering small groups of listeners about her. But soon everyone knew it too well – from memory – and even the town’s most devout lady Buddhists were left unmoved. The moment she began, her audiences felt only irritation.
‘I was so stupid –’
‘Yes, yes, you knew wolves came down into the villages when it snowed, because there was nothing to eat in the mountains,’ they would impatiently interrupt before stalking off.
She would stand there, mouth hanging stupidly open, watching as they distanced themselves, before moving on herself – as if she, too, were bored with her own tragedy.















SARAWAK NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE- THE ROAD TO MERDEKA
Thanks Meramat
Some of my remarks below are only made in a rhetorical manner – so no offence is intended.
Can’t say I would totally disagree with what you are saying either. We probably share a lot of common ground on this subject. Could I say you are not opposed to the idea of genuine independence but see a few immovable obstacles? May be it’s how to arrive at the solution.
Sure it is no use shouting about “Vote for Change”. It does sound quite empty. What are we voting for and what change do we actually want? More sweeteners and empty promises from our overseas overlord?
In April 2010 “Free Malaysia Today” reported that a group of Sabah abd Sarawak politicians and social activities who were pressing their case for independence .
The articles summarised the position for national self-determination. I have taken the liberty to post it below for everyone’s information
After scouring the pages of Hornbill Unleashed from its archive beginning from the inaugural date to the present, I was disappointed to find no report (unless I missed it) on this very important development or any real discussions of the issues of national independence in HU.
QUESTION OF REAL SARAWAK NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE
The question of national self determination and independence was seriously raised as an issue in the April Sabah Conference held to review the 47 years of the incorporation of Sabah and Sarawak in “Malaysia”. This conference was attended by over 500 people.
A number of Sabahans appear very determined to change their dependent colonial status and one courageous Sabahan has presented a paper in the UK Parliament on the Sabah political situation condemning Malaysia .
Hornbill Unleashed did previously explored the question of “secession”. The word “secession” implies that we had been willing “joined Malaysia” and the writer concluded it was better to stay on in “Malaysia”.
It depends on whether one views incporation itno “Malaysia” was a free choice or we were forced to join.
This writer’s view is that we were forced to join Malaysia and therefore is is not an issue of secession but of gaining national independence. How can a country be independent when it is incorporated with another country and rule by a forwign government?
The question is how to do it get our independence..
1. Referendum? Would the Sarawak people vote for independence if given the chance? Meramat was confident (if I have not read him incorrectly) that the people will vote for independence. I heartily support this stand.
2. Yes also fully agree that Kuala Lumpur whether under UMNO BN or PKR would never let this happen. We have think of other ways to achieve what we desire. Think.
Does that end the debate?
Of course not. Even Meramat does not rule out a time when Malaya might drop us like a “hot potato” – after they sucked dry our resources. But Malaya will hang as Sarawak still a large piece of valuable real estate. No colonial master will readily let go any territory although Britain dropped us quickly into the Malayan basket.
Meramat also mentioned that Sarawak is financing “Malaysia” Inc. to the tune of 40% of its Federal budget with our oil revenue.
This fact alone should jolt all of us out of our doldrums. We should see through the incredible lie popularised by Kl about how we would not be able to survive as a viable nation?
It does not take 47 years and a lot of brain power to work out the answer. Sarawak can finance 40% of “Malaysia”. We are financing not only the “development” of Malaya (now 2 generations ahead of us) and also feeding the UMNO BN corruption machine. If Sarawak can finance Malaya why can’t Sarawak finance itself and reap the full benefits? Surely we are not all that slow?
We had 47 years to be convinced that we have been forced into bad deal and exploitative relationship. What is there to gain by remaining in it? Unless we are all masochists we should get out of it.
For those of us who believe and aspire to real independence our role is to stimulate all Sarawak netizens to think beyond the the circle drawn around our minds by Kuala Lumpur propaganda and to spread the message- the call for freedom and independence.
We are not that helpless and we can do it alone.
This topic obviously does not end here and it should be continuously discussed..
Below is the news report.
________________________________________________________________________________
Push for Sabah, S’wak’s independence: Next stop UN
Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:54
By Athi Shankar
GEORGE TOWN: A group of prominent politicians and social activists from East Malaysia are seriously contemplating pulling out Sabah and Sarawak from the Federation of Malaysia.
They are planning to take up their case to the United Nations to hold a referendum on the status of the Borneo states as independent nations.
They no longer want their states to be under the clutches of the Umno-led Putrajaya administration.
The group has already sought legal advice from the international community to explore all orderly and democratic means to legally declare Sabah and Sarawak as separate sovereign states.
Sources said the group was keen to avoid any civil unrest, bloodshed and armed conflict with the central government, features usually associated with separatist movements.
“They want to resolve the pressing issue by peaceful and civilised means,” said the source.
It’s learnt that about seven representatives from the group met London-based Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) chairman P Waytha Moorthy in Indonesia early this week to discuss the matter.
Sources close to the group said the activists sought Waytha Moorthy’s help to facilitate their imminent representation in the UN.
It’s learnt that Waytha Moorthy had agreed to assist them, with the help of several influential international organisations.
Waytha Moorthy recently facilitated a group of activists to air their grouses and grievances against the federal government at the UK Parliament.
‘Systematic looting and plundering’
The group of activists are deeply perturbed by the federal government’s alleged violations of the states’ rights, interests and benefits for more than four decades since the formation of the Federation of Malaysia in 1963.
“The group is angry over the systematic looting and plundering of the states’ wealth by Umno and its cronies,” said a source.
Sabah, Sarawak, Malaya and Singapore formerly joined Malaysia in 1963. However, Singapore left the Federation in 1965.
The Sabah and Sarawak activists believe that just like Singapore, their states too can pull out from Malaysia.
Sabah and Sarawak are two natural resources rich provinces in Malaysia, with massive wealth potentials in oil reserves and forestry.
However, Sabahans and Sarawakians are convinced that they have remained poor due to the federal government’s “manipulation and usurpation” of their power to self-determine their own affairs.
Unhappy over petro dollars
They are crying foul over the mere five percent royalty cut received for their own oil, while the Putrajaya administration “steals” 95 percent of petro dollars.
“People from both Sabah and Sarawak realise that they are being short-changed. They know there has been daylight robbery of their god-given richness,” said a source.
Another contentious issue is the existence of an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrants as rightful citizens in Sabah.
Sabahans termed the illegal immigrants, mostly Filipino and Indonesian Muslims, as former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s legacy.
“The government since under Mahathir has systematically brought in these aliens and granted them citizenships. These aliens are now legal MyKad holders in Sabah. It’s absolutely outrageous and ludicrous,” said the source.
The illegal immigrant issue in Sarawak is not as disturbing as in Sabah although it is equally damaging.
‘Raping of forest wealth’
The major issue in Sarawak is the “raping of state forest wealth” by the Umno-backed Taib Mahmud’s government at the expense of the indigenous population.
The natives are also disgruntled by the usurpation of their customary land rights by the authorities despite a recent apex court ruling against it.
Sabahans and Sarawakians are also said to be peeved with the “Malaynisation and Islamisation” process of their states’ bureaucracy and political systems.
Activists claimed that the federal government had appointed native Muslims to helm various ministerial portfolios and government departments to hasten and fasten this process.
“These Muslim leaders and bureaucratic heads are puppets dancing to the tune played by their masters in Putrajaya,” said the source.
_____________________________________end of report_____________________________________
Comment by Abang — October 31, 2010 @ 6:20 PM |
Pak Bui,
There is another inconvenient truth: even if PR win all 31 MP seat from Sarawak: they (the Sarawakian MPs) will still be a minority in Parliment. Real power shall remain vested with the Malayan MPs. So what is new ? Are the Pakatan Rakyat MPs from Malaya somehow going to be more sympathetic towards the rural poor in Sarawak than those from BN ?
If Pakatan Rakyat wants to distinguish itself from the UMNO-led BN, in the eyes of Sarawakian, it would seem to me that the central and local leadership has to understand that Sarawakian are not so stupid as to believe PBB’s yoda trick that PR is “Orang Malaya” and the UMNO/PBB symbiosis is not.
The core issue that would strike a cord with Sarawakian from all levels of society will be the explanation to my little inconvenient truth.
The comments by Mata Kuching would not help to explanation away the “inconvenient truth”. But its a start.
PR leadership has to come up with a better formulated body of propositions for Sarawak and Sabah v.a.v Malaya. It is not enough to want to give away 20% royalty, but such “political concession” has to be rationalized into a theme together with other “change” proposals such as those that many has listed.
If PR leadership can do that, and speak to the old and young generations of Sarawakian (and Sabahan for that that matter), that a Federal Government led by PR, would not only re-instate the original “Malaysia” contract that has been torn to shreds by BN rule,but that PR would introduce bold and progressive “autonomy” enclave so that Sabah and Sarawak can attract the best and brightest of Malaysians (including from Malaya) to contribute to the state, they may be surprise to see that Sarawakian may learn to believe them rather than Taib.
Now, the by-election in Sabah would be an interesting test case for PR leadership. SAPP was chided by some Malaya writers for reprising the strident “Sabah for Sabahan” slogan of PBS olden days. Furthermore,within PKR rank itself, it may be no coincident that Daniel John Jambun – who had presented Sabah post-colonial woes to the British Parliment, appear to have been systematically sideline by the central and local party loyalist. So as a mosquito party, if SAPP would win the by-election, that should force PR to rethink of Sarawakian and Sabahan in a bit more sophisticated term than the stupid country bumpkins who deserve their government. They will have to think why would they want to give away 20% oil royalty – and not just for the vote fishing expedition !
Then again, 31 MPs aren’t that significant to PR – compare to the billions that the MPs from Malaya (BN or PR) can peruse in their own backyard by keeping the royalty at present level – even if for nothing else, the MPs can use the money to shorten the traffic jam from their house to the nearby grocery store from 3 hours to 10 minutes. So -while it may be high time that Sarawakian stop their miserable sob stories for being dirt poor and with 1950s infrastructure, our enlightened Malaya brethren politician may prove to be not that keen to “Change”.
Comment by MERAMAT TAJAK — October 29, 2010 @ 9:39 PM |
WHITHER SARAWAK?
Both Pak Bui & M Tajak may well have touch on the different parts of the same problem. But am not clear what solution/s do P Bui or Tajak propose?.
True, we are still being sold an old nag- that is, PR’s solution is really to reinstate the original “Malaysia” contract. UMNO PBB BN may have no argument against this and quite happily take on board their proposals and thus undermine PR’s position. So what’s new?
But you intelligentsia out there in cyberspace know that this old nag “Malaysia” is due for the glue factory.
The whole problem is what actually do the Sarawak (or Sabah)people want?
Do we continue to vote for UMNO PBB BN and be ruled by a new colonial master Kuala Lumpur/Putra Jaya, successor of the departed British Colonial power and or be granted autonomy (the sweetener)a la Acheh? (Did you notice how the volatile situation in Acheh was so quickly diffused and diluted after years of armed struggle? Ached remained part of Indonesia but the issues and problems are still there. So who got what?)
OR SHOULD we rely on oursleves and achieve national self-determination (genuine independence)? That’s the question.
The current opposition parties have more than enough issues to play with- from the sufferings of the rural poor – many now facing another major economic and social disaster with the Rajang drying up preceded by the log jam, plight of landowners to issues of elected representatives acting in conflict of interest by engaging in major “transparent” corruption and bleeding our country dry through nepotism and cronism.
The BN “gomen” had 47 years to eradicate all this poverty and implement economic advancement.
And what happened? We have “backward” development. The people’s situation changed for the worse because while under the Brook Raj our lands were legally “protected” the new colonial government removed the legal protections.Their cronies seized these lands and literally ripped of the wealthy off land owned by the native peoples. And of course Kuala Lumpur already assured that the jewel in the crown our oil wealth was already in its pocket from the very start. Yes, how stupid were our leaders then. Should they continue to be so (stupid)?
Have you all forgotten or were just not taught at school (since BN re-wrote history for us- the victors get to write their version of history) that we were a semi-independent country before the Japanese occupation?
OK, we can be forgiven for no knowing that the “9 Cardinal Principles” the charter for our independence had been drawn up on the eve of the Japanese invasion. You could say history intervened. We were going to achieve nationhood if British had not taken control of our country after the Japanese and within 17 years sold us out to Malayan control.
This was the political situation then.
But we will never get anywhere until the local politicians start to express a true patriotic stand other than showing their concern and care for the people. They must see the big picture and realise that these issues of the people’s sufferings are only symptons of our colonial status. We are dominated and ruled by a foreign government. Is this what we want?
No Sarawak opposition leaders have shown their true patriotism for our benighted and woeful country by expressing their true feelings if they have it.
Are they wishing to continue in this submissive manner? The Sabahans are not afraid to stand up and call and spade a spade and asked for nothing short of independence. (They were offered “autonomy” – would they be appeased?) While they have done a few things to highlight their colonial status,we in Sarawak are still playing kopitiam politics. We are bogged down with the sort of things KL is happy to allow us to protest about. It knows they can still dominate us by various means.
So where do we go from here?
Do we want prostrate ourselves and submissively accept another 47 years of the plunder and suffering imposed on us? We can all see that if Kuala Lumpur and its local puppets have taken our so much wealth, our country is not poor. Why be trapped in the old colonial lie and self pity of not being able to “govern ourselves”.
The story of “Ah Q” was a metaphor for China (the “Sick Man of Asia”) under Manchu rule which failed to foreign domination.
We know that China underwent re-birth inspired by such writers as Lu Shun. The Chinese overthrew Manchu
rule and established a Republic and went through another 50 years of fighting against each other and the Japanese to finally free themselves from foreign domination. It further went through several decades of internal struggles before the 1980s when they embraced capitalism.(This may not be everyone’s solution)However,from an extremely backward country China has advanced a long way from the 1980s and even faster than we in Sarawak of 47 years in “Malaysia”.
So fellow country men and women- think for ourselves and ask what do we want. Shall we not grasp our destiny in our hands and determine our future free from foreign domination?
Comment by Abang — October 30, 2010 @ 11:26 AM |
Abang,
Well, I can’t say I disagree with you.
Independence – as in – Sarawak emerge as a republic of equals, with a modern constitution, and a brand new system of government that can be constructed from scratch – taking the best that 21st century mind can offer about how to build a new nation ?
Yes, that would catapult Sarawak from 4th world, to 1st world status in 5 years.
But, lets not kid ourselves about 2 things.
1) If a referendum were to be done today on whether Sarawakian wants to remain in Malaysia, or to build a new country free of Malaya influence, I would bet my last dollar that Sarawakian will choose independence.
However:
2) It is also a fait accompli that no such referendum will ever be allowed by the government of Malaysia (BN or PR),not only because the Federal Constitution prohibit secession in the first place, but because of plain common sense: why would Malaya wants to risk losing its prized possession?
Even if for the sake of argument, a Federal Government led by PR were to relent and even grant a non-binding referendum to be conducted, and assuming further down the road – that Malaya would then be so kind as to allow Sarawak to become a country on its own – can Sarawak become one ?
I’m afraid, it won’t be a walk in the park. Not without an external geopolitical power player to act as guarantor, for practical issues such as government debt. And in today’s world, I doubt there would be any power out there who would lift a finger, and risk eroding trade and investment opportunities with KL.
So, the next best option – thats comparatively more doable, is to bargain for a better deal with Malaya. Cut the crap about voting for change, for the hope of change – but vote for a brand new Federation. Thats what Sarawakian should vote for. What kind of a federation is that ? Well, the kind that’s “real”. The kind that does not continue to victimize Sarawak to be one of the poorest state in Malaysia, with no systemic political change in sight to reverse the slide.
Within the PR political narrative, it seems to me that there is a gap between what constitute a reformation from the Malaya perspective, and what it would be for Sabah and Sarawak. Since the Malaya states has advance so much more than Sarawak in socio-economic indicators, their definition of reforms is more incremental, befitting the advanced status of their society.
But Sarawak is at least 2 generations behind Malaya. She has different socio development priorities. As an example, although its good to be prudent in public spending, and to spend in areas where there would be sufficient returns on investment, I can’t imagine applying the same criterion for Sarawak as for Malaya but clearly thats what has happened for the last donkey years whenever a Federal Budget is formulated by the PM office. This is assuming, the Malaya MPs – even with their numerical superiority, would be more objective and would not vote with bias in favor of their backyard. So would PR leadership reconstitute a new Federation and redefine Sarawak place in it ? No, unless they want Sarawak votes bad enough – and unless Sarawakian clearly state what they want.
My last word on Independence : there can come a time when Malaya would be all too happy to let Sarawak get off the Federation. I think it will not happen for so long as there is still oil and gas in Sarawak to finance up to 44% of the Federal Budget(Sarawak share is probably 30%). Give it another 20 to 30 years when the oil and gas would dry up. By then, be it BN or PR – Malaya folk, would be happy to drop Sarawak like a hot potato. Unless there is something else after the black gold, that Malaya desperately need to build its superhighway, MRT,LRT, mega towers etc etc.
Comment by Meramat Tajak — October 30, 2010 @ 5:42 PM |
Dear Vernon,
It is time to join in our rank in our fight for justice for all Sarawakians. I am an old friend of yours and wish you the best of luck. I am glad that you realised the suffering of the Ibans under Taib. From an old friend.
Mak Miki
Comment by Sarawakian — October 29, 2010 @ 4:22 PM |
Mak Miki? Old friend? How intriguing
Email me please at vernonkedit(at)yahoo(dot)com
Comment by Vernon Kedit — October 29, 2010 @ 4:35 PM |
To understand the present, we must know the past. Iban politics began centuries ago, and I hope to publish the REAL history of the Iban soon. But it needs your help and support: http://ourbookproject.blogspot.com
Thank you Hornbill Unleashed.
Comment by Vernon Kedit — October 29, 2010 @ 4:04 PM |
Dear brothers and sisters in Sarawak, the power is now in your hands to do what’s right for the future of Sarawakians.
For once in the history of Malaysia, your votes will have tremendous impact not only in Sarawak but the whole of Malaysia.
I pray that your wisdom will prevail in this crucial state election.
Comment by PH Chin — October 29, 2010 @ 11:30 AM |
That’s good to know. But not all the power. If we had it all, those idiots would have packed up and run away!
Even the election process is not completely fair.
Let’s tell all those who will deliver their vote to treasure that voting power and look after it by telling others, too.
Let’s ask those and help those who have help from others and guard that vote!!!
In recent memory, the vote in Sibu Parliament seat was handled in s shameless, gutless way!
Comment by Sam Paya — October 29, 2010 @ 12:05 PM |
Here’s an example of Batu Sapi -
More at …Sarawak Indigenous Commuinity News
Comment by Sam Paya — October 29, 2010 @ 1:22 PM |
Malaysians in Sabah and Sarawak must make their stand loud and clear that we are not the adopted children of UMNO controlled BN government. Among the demand for additional 20% petroleum royalty, we must make our stand that BM as the official language does not apply to Sabah and Sarawak and that ENglish is still our official language and the Borneo states has no official religion.
Vote Pakatan for 25% petroleum royalty.
Vote Pakatan to ensure English is the official language of Sarawak and Sabah.
Vote Pakatan to ensure that Sarawak and Sabah have no official language.
Vote Pakatan to scrap all addition dams proposed by Taib.
Vote Pakatan to ensure all government projects are subject to Open tender.
Vote Pakatan to ensure Taib Mahmud, Musa Aman, other corrupted ministers and officials and their cronies shall be investigated by MACC .
Vote Pakatan to ensure the post of the chief minister of Sarawak and Sabah shall be limited to only two terms.
Comment by Mata Kuching — October 29, 2010 @ 7:04 PM |
correction ..that Sarawak and Sabah have no official religion
Comment by Mata Kuching — October 29, 2010 @ 7:05 PM |
Why 25% petroleum royalty?
Sarawak oil money provides 40% of Malaya’s budget. We wan 100% back as they have for 47 years taken out billions and billions of or money!
Comment by anotherheadhunter — November 2, 2010 @ 11:10 AM |
If you are saying PBB and UMNO are totally conquered by “Orang Malaya” and their main plan is to take over Sarawak and Sabah, and because of that we as Sarawakian and Sabahan people must give way to Pakatan Rakyat and other opposition gang. Then in that case, PKR, DAP and PAS are not “Orang Malaya” it is?..this 3 parties are established because of this 3 “Orang Malaya” also..So where is your point..??..
Comment by Perwira Sarawak — October 29, 2010 @ 10:23 AM |
What’s the difference?
1.You have corrupt “Orang Malaya”/UMNO/BN. 2.You have corrupt Taib. 3.You have corrupt PBB/BN.
Take as long as you need to figure it out!!!
Comment by otak-otak — October 29, 2010 @ 1:32 PM |
Today, the Honorable member for Kapit reminded that the government promises to build a road to Kapit 10 years ago.
Ten years from now he will issue a second reminder.
The final reminder will come 20 years from now.
He will take action when four decades have past.
A snail would have circumnavigated the world countless times when the memeber comes to his senses & join PR.
Comment by gongong — October 29, 2010 @ 9:30 AM |
The late Tun Jugah and his son Leonard Linggi were hoping that their community and people living in Song and Kapit could be connected to Sibu at least. Only now the late Tun Jugah’s grandson was lamenting that the governmet of BN in which he is part of as MP, had reneged on its promise made 10 years ago to construct a road linking Song to Kapit and Sibu.
Many older residents of Kapit and Song would have already died without their dream road and the development plan is still in BN’s incubator or Taib’s Mahmud trash bin.
BN Sarawak under Taib can continue to make empty promises but the Dayaks dont give a shit anymore. Enough is enough. 47 years of waiting is defintely insane and too long. We dont mind having to walk and cycle to Sibu through jungle tracks and have decided to vote for change. We want a new government.
My vote and that of my family members are for Pakatan.
Comment by Wilfred — October 29, 2010 @ 8:39 AM |
“LINK ROAD”
Maybe Tun Jugah’s great great great great grandson will still be wondering what happended andhow we were “conned” by Tunku Abdul Rahman and his British master…
The ROAD was talked about 47 years ago when we were “linked” with Malaya.
Don’t forget that it was Tun Jugah who had suspicions about joining “Malaysia”- he said the sugar cane will become less sweet as you chew towards the end. The “sweetness” or honeymoon was over from day one when Malaya took control of our oil and the word was given to chop down our trees.
While they talked in Parliament they were busy filling up their pockets with oil and timber cash and billions of dollars gone into the pockets of the likes of Taib & Co and Mahathir & Co.
There must enough money to build seevral trunk roads to and from one end of Sarawak to the other end of Sabah and around many many times.
Spread the word around and inform those who are not so informed why we must vote out the corrupt politicians.
Comment by Anotherheadhunter — October 29, 2010 @ 12:47 PM |
SO DONT YOU THINK ITS TIME TO SO THESE ORANG MALAYA THE TRUE COLOUR OF SARAWAKIAN…..ITS ABOUT TIME TO ASK TO TAKE A HIKE….GET LOST… AND TO ALL THEIR BN CRONIES IN SARAWAK…FUCK OFF FROM SARAWAK!!!!
Comment by People Power — October 29, 2010 @ 3:29 PM |
ASK THEM TO
Comment by People Power — October 29, 2010 @ 3:30 PM |
And too! We don’t need those korupt Sarawakians. Fcuk off all kurap Sarawakians from Sarawak.
Comment by MBKS Parking Company — October 29, 2010 @ 4:17 PM |
DEAR HORNBILL UNLEASHED : this below ground breaking comment series is yours to edit and refine so long the tone and intent remain unaltered. Loyar Burok site has removed these comments. Please repost here for everyone to study and draw conclusion or comment on. Thank you in advance for ensuring freedom of speech.
GROUNDBREAKING COMMENT SERIES FROM LOYAR BUROK :
ALERT! ALARM! HALARM!
read more here : http://wp.me/PtBIM-2UV
Comment by AgreeToDisagree — October 29, 2010 @ 12:30 AM |