Some may laud and magnify their characteristics which they proclaim to be the epitome of true Malaysian identity.
What makes us Malaysian? Is it the color of our skin? Is it homogenized culture – as in the clothes we wear, food we eat, festivals we celebrate or music we listen to or the customs we observe and practise as handed down from one generation to another??
Does anyone have the right to be ethnocentric when some members of their own community, worse still some of their leaders, do not honor or respect others who co-exist in this beautiful land?
When there are those who cannot comprehend the history of this nation as expounded by John Doe in The Demise of Malacca, Roadmap for Ketuanan and Origin of Malays (Part 1-3) and yet ram their version of history down our throats and have the audacity to change that distorted version again, can we expect the next generation to grow up with a deep sense of belonging and patriotism to their motherland?
Recently, Dr. Michael Chick drew my attention to the following chart which clearly shows the identity of the Austronesians. According to the chart, a typical Malay could be a Native of Taiwan (30%) + Native of Thailand (30%) + Indian (20%) + Chinese (10%) + Others (10%).
It is clear that some cannot comprehend the whole concept of nationhood because they cannot see beyond their noses or bank accounts!!! And yet they deny and deny despite overwhelming evidence of their destructive ethnocentrism.
Are they capable of learning and developing this beautiful country or are they intent on building their little empires, controlling their little Napoleans and promoting their brand of patriotism that stinks sky high? It appears that they can never face up to the truth as it would show up their own weaknesses, failings and deceptive ways!
Would they dare to combat social ills, corruption, inequality, injustice and discrimination and the many social ills that we face? What have they done to develop social cohesiveness, harmony, tolerance, equality and meritocracy? Does it appear that some prefer to let others remain STUPID, IGNORANT and most of all, POOR?
It almost seems as though their brand of patriotism is a one person viewpoint of how an elite group want to manipulate others by pulling the puppet strings of the elected ones. To exacerbate matters, they constantly keep the citizens fearful and docile.
With that, can we truly be a united nation?
Recent events have been most disheartening too. Many are fed up the elected ones have failed to keep their campaign speeches. Some have been alleged to have taken advantage of their position to advance their own agenda.
What are we getting today? A lot or very little?
Some good leaders have come into the picture but spanners have been thrown in to stymie their progress and potential. The evil ones would block or vote against anything good that goes against their own agenda and blame the good guys.
Recently, many are filled with despair and disappointment. Silence could be a form of self-preservation (and yours truly is one of them). When confronted with incompetence, ridiculous decisions or bureaucratic bloopers and unresolved issues, any self-respecting person would distance themselves from such lunacy!
What about our perception? How can we progress when some are deliberately delusional about our global competitiveness, education standards, economic performance or even level of corruption? What about freedom of speech? Each time an elected representative highlights an issue, some make it difficult to expose issues which are inconsistent, contradictory, ridiculous and appalling.
Can you imagine what sort of history our grandchildren will be studying thirty years down the road? Is it going to be a history that is tainted by the prevalence of negative influences in power or will it be a history that we can be proud of?
Obviously, there is no place for jaguh kampungs who thrive in syiok sendiri euphoria. Provincial myopia will get us nowhere. We have to put to death this silly, immature pride of “Face” and forsake superiority complex. To progress, we have to bulldoze absolute selfishness and ZERO common sense to the ground via high education standards that glorify values and norms that would develop a generation of creative thinkers.
Our national identity transcends race and many other nitty-gritty issues which have been played to the hilt by the evil ones. We are screwed big time if we do not do something to change this situation which is STILL reversible. It will be IRREVERSIBLE if we persist in being stupid enough to vote in the same government that prevents us from becoming truly Malaysian.
Do we have a national identity that binds us together cohesively, one that all can be proud to possess and proclaim? Without a sense of identity, can we be truly Malaysian?
Allow me to quote from a dialogue I had this afternoon with Dr. Michael Chick :
- How do we define ourselves?
- Do we use someone else’s predefined identity?
- Do we define ourselves by our religion, or do we define ourselves by our Nationality?
- Do you define yourself by your Job? Or do you define yourself by your “Race”?
- Is our name the ONLY singular ingredient in defining ourselves?
- And if you ONLY introduce yourself by your name, does it mean anything to anyone at all?
- If it does, so what? and if it doesn’t, so what?
Is identifying ourselves by someone else’s identity the ONLY way to “hitch on” or “Piggy Back” on another identity? without which, we almost don’t exist?
The same pathetic reason is given when many claim to know “so and so”, so as to appear “important”. Why can’t people use themselves as the reference instead? Are people really “nobody” unless they can drop names? Because I certainly pity those who do.
When I introduce myself, I only state my name, and and is that enough for others to want to associate themselves with me? How many can do that? My reputation should precede me in most cases, and times. What’s with the “unknown entities” which form 99.99% of the population? Are we only important because we know an “entity”?
If this be so, then it is no wonder that individuals need to “defend their God”, hang on preciously to their “race” coz without it, they are simply ……. n o t h i n g.
Please rethink you identity, and determine if you can really define yourself in any other ways other than latching on to someone else’s.
So what makes us Malaysian at this point of time? It is being smart and brave enough to VOTE FOR CHANGE in the next elections.
I believe you will, because you love Malaysia and you ARE a true-blue Malaysian in your heart and soul.














Thank you for your expression of good intentions.
But most of us still think we are Sarawakians colonised by Malaya!
Your article should apply only to Malayans. So Sorry.
We wish to be exclude including become independent from KL rule forever.
Comment by Anaksarawak1963 — January 2, 2011 @ 10:35 PM |
Malaysian:Malay,Chinese,Indian and Lain-lain.Why we the Dayaks still call lain-lain??
Comment by babai — December 12, 2010 @ 11:42 PM |
Utopia is Capitalism with Socialist Caps on Personal Wealth, US$20 Million should be reasonable enough. The surplus anyone generates will go directly to infrastructure, housing, education, food distribution etc..
I see the world here. Those who start wars or poison the lands with GMOs are the CANCER of the PLANET. Being the highest intelligences extended from the planet, it would be best we mark them out clearly for what they are yet retain the disease/cancer cultures in places where they can play their sick games among themselves. The violence and murder should be kept in living museums or ‘Black Districts’ to be observed and studied.
Never will another nuclear device be built. Never will another mutated GMO crop or mosquito or killer bee afflict the world. Never will any commodity and property speculators destroy the world economy with excess wealth they do not know how to use constructively. Never will fraudulent bankers or plutocrats sequester all the wealth of mankind while billions starve or have no access to education or healthcare. Never will another shot be fired between countries for expansion of occupied territories which in fact belong to all mankind.
The rest of the free world must vote for politicians based on such criteria :
(1) TERM LIMITS, (2) DECLARATIONS of ASSETS, (3) PROHIBITION OF OLIGARCHY/NEPOTISM, (4) SOCIALIST LIMITS on MAXIMUM ASSETS for all mankind (5) SPIRIT OF THE LAW.
This is the best way for Mankind to transcend the madness these beasts in human form wish to destroy us with. Meanwhile please do not overpopulate as well, and not oppress in the same way we are being oppressed.
Where is Zaid’s base in Sarawak or Sabah? Or AKIM? We must ensure that this idealism proliferates to ensure survival of species, the unsustainable Capitalist paradigm must be replaced with a reasoned Socialist paradigm. Time for the Human Race to advance past the last century’s failures of Capitalism and extreme Communism.
Comment by AgreeToDisagree — December 12, 2010 @ 2:49 PM |
Mr A2A,
Good ideas!
We have no hangups with capital. We could see more sense in the dollar. It’s the “ism” that bugs us.
The Malaysian Bar carries a good article by Datuk Vohrah on some of the ills in the management of Malaysia. We probably could see that a sensible solution to our national ills might start with a few which will knock on and excite plenty of other wholesome values.
As for the coming elections there’s a lot of jerebu out there that will vanish when the monsoon brings winds of change!
But you’re right! The isms in the despots and the tyrannts are just running wild and the very people whose job it is to fix are devoid of simple wholesome will. They’ve lost it. And we’re gonna lose it all if …
But have no fear, we do know the “1Malaysia Klinik” will vanish, too, with the bomohs and the dukuns.
Comment by ctzen — December 12, 2010 @ 3:22 PM |
Thanks for the kind word! I read Datuk Vohrah’s article and it describes separation of powers and conflict of interest. They should also separate the Prime Minister’s and Finance Minister’s Post. Then there is the issue of not allowing politicians to be *given* minister’s posts. Those can only be given to academic Phd holders from Universities or RETIRED long serving bureaucrats in the same ministry who also have the same relevant Phds.
Politicians are supposed to be the check and balance to bring forward problems, they are NOT skilled or trained or qualified to hold any Ministerial positions. Nor should anyone gunning for the PM’s post be from any political party. This way the nation will not be beholden to politicians from any coalition.
There is a massive amount of democratisation and political RELEARNING to be done. Glad to know that there are some people who are intent on TRULY LIBERALISING the not very democratic political system as it stands into something truly participative. @ctzen, set up a party or join AKIM or maybe MCLM (if MCLM doesn’t become a dr.Evil trojan by Marina’s presence somehow).
Here’s 2 links that readers and future candidates need to study and try to apply :
Preventing Nepotism / Conflict of Interest
http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs461.snc3/25344_1268878200793_1194968379_30784597_3963653_t.jpg
Gambier Threat here :
http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1378/gambier1.jpg
@ctzen, run in your constitution if you can afford it! Give us a thinking MP or Assemblyman rather than an Oligarch for a change!
Comment by AgreeToDisagree — December 13, 2010 @ 3:32 PM |
Mr A2A,
If you mean “run in your constituency”, no I won’t! But that doesn’t mean we can’t express relevant public opinion, especially so now with Internet Access in increasing levels and the new awareness of society and politicians about the need to be closely relevant to social and economic issues.
The phase of Malaysia politics now seems to be overwhelming – it appears to grow from all sides, perspectives. It’s good in general, it could be a disaster in other spheres as the large bulk of the rural population seems to be only slowly warming up. There’s a slack to take up. What appears more urgent are economic issues to these voters. On the other hand, economic issues are reactive to political understanding of how power is dispersed and the extent power is utilised for doubly laden progress – increasing prosperity and wealth and the enlightenment for socio-political progress, not to mention socio-cultural balance when we bump into religious issues.
It’s difficult to mix and match different categorical values such as religious and economic ones: good governance and accountability are approachable from both perspectives of values. If you manage the economy well, with those values, others fall into place even maybe reluctantly!?
I was reading today about some JAKIM people arresting Shia Muslim adherents because Malaysia is Sunni. This bias and potentially detrimental incident should have been addressed 3 decades ago via our education system so those people manning JAKIM can exercise good governance and be accountable especially within the ambit of our multiculturalism today!
I keep telling friends that if you could persecute anyone for anything at all, you actively forment your own demise. In other words, the Malays need to protect the Dayaks who need to protect the Chinese who in turn protect etc. etc and the cycle goes, if you want to get out of this big trap in ideology. Didn’t someone say the bell tolls for thee!?
If we try to understand these one way or another, it helps us to be brave, courageous and better. I think that’s what courage is all about.
My motto is simple : prosper and don’t take money away from people; when you do, they won’t have any left to buy anything from you!
Comment by ctzen — December 17, 2010 @ 10:48 PM |
Those who won’t vote for change are no less Malaysians. They might not be well at the moment. You could make them “whole” but please don’t go to “1Malaysia Klinik“. They have only bomohs there who could disappear soon after the elections!
Comment by ctzen — December 12, 2010 @ 2:37 PM |
BTW, Dr Michael Chick might be a quack. Ask Mrs Heng! He can’t tell between a calcium deficiency and the hippocrates horn!
Comment by ctzen — December 12, 2010 @ 2:50 PM |