Hornbill Unleashed

July 31, 2011

A hung Parliament: Can it happen in Malaysia and what will it be like

Filed under: Human rights,Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 12:00 AM
Tags: , , ,

A hung Parliament: Can it happen in M'sia and what will it be likeMaclean Patrick

In a two-party parliamentary system of government, a hung parliament occurs when neither major political party (or bloc of allied parties) has an absolute majority of seats in the parliament.

This was exactly the case in Australia in 2010 where there are 150 members in the House of Representatives, so to have an outright majority one of the parties needs to hold 76 seats. Neither Labor nor the Coalition reached that point. Instead, they’ll had to negotiate with the three sitting independents who have been re-elected – Tony Windsor, Bob Katter and Rob Oakeshott – as well as the Greens’ Adam Bandt, who won the seat of Melbourne.

Eventually the Labor party lead by Julia Gillard won over the independents to form a minority government.

BN at its height controlled 92% of Parliament

In looking at the political landscape of Malaysia, it can be divided into two – Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

Barisan Nasional is made up of 13 major component parties whilst Pakatan Rakyat has 3 and there are probably 5 major parties that do not affiliate themselves to either BN or Pakatan and a host of other non-significant parties that are not represented in parliament.

To date, both BN and Pakatan have contested in every parliament seat in Malaysia, in a bid to win a clear majority rule in parliament.

In the March 2004 general election, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi led Barisan Nasional to a landslide victory, in which Barisan Nasional recaptured the state of Terengganu. The coalition controlled 92% of the seats in Parliament.

It is indeed ironic that in 2005, Mahathir stated that “I believe that the country should have a strong government but not too strong. A two-thirds majority like I enjoyed when I was prime minister is sufficient but a 90% majority is too strong. We need an opposition to remind us if we are making mistakes. When you are not opposed you think everything you do is right.”

The Malaysian public took Mahathir’s up to his word and gave the opposition huge gains in the 2008 general elections by granting them 5 states and denying BN a two-thirds majority rule.

Taib’s 14 seats

A hung parliament almost was the case in Perak after the General Elections of 2008, when several Pakatan elected MPs chose to turn-coat and pronounce themselves Independent. But it quickly became a minority rule when the Independent MPs then pledged support to Barisan Nasional. This gave BN rule over Perak.

Malaysian voters can send the majority vote either way. Yet, it is still plausible on a micro-level that a tussle for individual states may cause a hung parliament or minority rule.

In the plausible case of a hung parliament, who then would determine the winners? There are two scenarios that can come about in the advent of a hung parliament. Firstly, if Sarawak decides to turn-coat and secondly if UMNO MPs revolt.

If 2008 and the recent Sarawak elections are taken into account, a hung parliament will be decided by the Malay vote. And most likely the 14 seats held by Taib Mahmud’s PBB party in Sarawak will be king-maker.

If Taib’s 14 seats decide to turn-coat and declare themselves Independent, then we will have a hung parliament. Both BN or Pakatan will be unable to form a majority rule government. Instead, they will be forced to negotiate with the Independents. And this would be an interesting situation because it means that the fate of the government will be dependent on who can come up with the best deal for Taib Mahmud.

UMNO MPs

The second scenario takes into account the dissatisfaction within the UMNO ranks towards Najib’s administration.

In all likely-hood, if a number of UMNO MPs turn-coat and declare themselves as Independents and let both BN and Pakatan vie for their attention, then Malaysia will have a hung parliament.

It is into this situation that Ku Li’s latest startup, Amanah, may play a significant role.

Ku Li is best identified as the man who in 1987 challenged former Mahathir Mohamad for the leadership of UMNO and lost by a very small margin. Out of pique, he quit UMNO and founded the splinter party Semangat 46 before returning to the UMNO fold a decade later. But he was never able to act as much more than a figure on the fringes till now. In the light of an embattled Najib, Ku Li has come forward presenting an alternative cause to that of the BN and Pakatan.

Already, Amanah is generating a buzz among fence-sitters who have lost faith in BN, yet are wary of Pakatan. Will Amanah be a strong enough influence to create a third political force? This is something that only time can prove.

The 2008 General Election has proven that BN’s strangle-hold on the two-thirds majority can be broken. And that may well have been the first step to a change in government. The case for a hung parliament in Malaysia is slim, yet it is something that is very plausible owing to the fluid and morphing nature of Malaysian politics. But it needs an ideal setting where we have fair and free election practices.

So until Malaysia sees free and fair elections, it will really be BN who would fight tooth and nail with all their resources and tools to never allow a hung parliament in Malaysia. Just in case even money won’t be able to buy over the Independents!

- Malaysia Chronicle

Advertisement

10 Comments »

  1. While speaking to student leaders, Najib said BN is a faithful follower of democracy as demonstrated by 2004 election when BN did not “disturb” PAS in Kelantan although BN only lost by one seat.

    Wait a minute, but the PM IN 2004 was Abullah, the God fearing man.

    BUT Najib DID NOT MENTION THE DISGRACEFUL CHANGING OF PERAK STATE GOVERNMENT IN 2009 WHEN HE HIMSELF WAS THE PM.

    Comment by Sariah — August 1, 2011 @ 12:36 PM | Reply

  2. NO NEED FOR ANY “HUNG PARLIAMENT” JUST HANG UMNO AT THE ELECTIONS AND SAVE THE PAIN OF HAVING TO PUT UP WITH MORE MINDLESS UMNO NONSENSE!

    Comment by Anon — July 31, 2011 @ 10:43 AM | Reply

    • Another way to solve the problem is military rule directly under agong. That would be fun. Something we have not tried and experienced.

      Comment by Wak Domo — July 31, 2011 @ 11:22 AM | Reply

      • WE HAVE ALREADY HAD MILITARY RULE DURING THE “EMERGENCY” 1948- 1960 & THEN 1969….

        Comment by Anon — July 31, 2011 @ 11:40 PM | Reply

  3. “The Malaysian public took Mahathir’s up to his word and gave the opposition huge gains in the 2008 general elections by granting them 5 states and denying BN a two-thirds majority rule.”

    Wak personally have a strong reservation on this comment. The opposition huge gains in the 2008 general elections was not due to the, “Malaysian public took Mahathir’s up to his word”; it was mainly due to the Malay (uninformed) sympathy towards Anwar’s case and their punitive dissidence towards UMNO (which was equated to Tun Dr Mahathir,  seen as the ‘bad guy’ who had ‘punished’ Anwar unfairly). Take note that Anwar was released prior to the GE and, as typical of him – lost no time to begin his political onslaughts. Thereby, the opposition parties gained a tsunamic momentum. This drew the Chinese and Indians voters who were solid BN supporters to lean towards the opposition. Hence, BN lost its two-third majority. 

    Comment by Wak Domo — July 31, 2011 @ 7:22 AM | Reply

  4. It is indeed ironic that in 2005, Mahathir stated that “I believe that the country should have a strong government but not too strong. A two-thirds majority like I enjoyed when I was prime minister is sufficient but a 90% majority is too strong. We need an opposition to remind us if we are making mistakes. When you are not opposed you think everything you do is right.”

    If Maclean Patrick, the author of this write up is really the writer and he is a Mat Salleh Wak Domo would like to tell him and other readers like him that when he describes Tun Dr Mahathir’s statement as ‘ironic’ he has indeed come to a point where two manner of thinking or two cultures are juxtaposed. Where he should not try to interpret our thinking in light of his own cultural and if applicable, religious background. The statement shows us a leader:
    1) Who is not crazy about power. To such a leader, power is just an enabler for the development of the nation that he loves; and
    2) Who is aware of the role of ‘Justice’ in governance. Such an awareness is often driven by ‘fear of God’ which has been inculcated since the person is still very young.

    To Wak, this is typical of a ‘supra Malay’ or
    ‘traditional Malay’ mind. If such is enriched with knowledge and actuated by an analytical mind it can bring a lot of good to the country. This is clearly evident in the Tun’s performance as Malaysia’s PM. On the other hand, it may put a Malay (or any person) in dilemma and at times succumb to self destructive compromises. Thank you.

    Comment by Wak Domo — July 31, 2011 @ 6:06 AM | Reply

    • Dr M obviously has no fear of God. He is only afraid of his wife Siti Hasmah. Just like Najib obeys his wife, Puffyhair, and Taib obeys his sister Roziah. Maybe they think they can buy a place in heaven.

      Comment by Landowner — July 31, 2011 @ 11:45 AM | Reply

      • Haiya! My countryman Landowner… Why disappoint Wak? You opposition supporters always write under assumptions. Be analytical lah – then Wak can believe and join you. Come on my cpuntryman…

        Comment by Wak Domo — July 31, 2011 @ 1:54 PM | Reply

        • Analytical, hmmm. Okay, this Wak Domo is part of PBB’s Dream Team of internet warriors as announced by Adenan Satem’s son. They are using taxpayers’ money to pay these halfwits to spread their propaganda of how the PBB and umno has brought development. Better write in the Borneo Post la Wak Domo. You’re no countryman of mine. You live in Taib’s Disneyland.

          Comment by Landowner — July 31, 2011 @ 2:28 PM | Reply

        • wak domo….so stupid of you..you are born without a father..bastard you are…wasn’t your mama ashamed of you…

          Comment by dust2dust — August 1, 2011 @ 8:09 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 88 other followers