Hornbill Unleashed

December 9, 2012

The colour of money

Sim Kwang Yang

Judging by the rustling of the wind against the coconut leaves, and the movement of the stars at night, another general election is afoot.

The winds of electoral war ravage through our national media. On a daily basis, we are bombarded with the reported words and movements of our prominent political personalities. This period is necessarily one of plotting, planning, manoeuvring, mobilising, speculating, scheming, rumour-mongering, and downright horse-trading.

The time-honoured practice of horse-trading involves the exchange of seats and candidates between friendly parties, and is born out of the nature of our alliance politics. Within both the ruling and the opposition alliances, there will be the usual scrambling for the choicest cut of the electoral pie.

Where the dictate of territorial imperative reigns supreme, the strongest survives. That means Umno in the BN, and PR in the loose and often unruly opposition front.

This is the season for politicians. They must be very busy and stressed out, dealing with the one thousand and one issues in preparation for the big contest, upon which their political and other fortunes hang precariously. The stakes are sky-high.

Away from the limelight though, far removed from public scrutiny, there is a nationwide exercise of scrapping the bottom of the barrel for cash.

What people often fail to realise is that democracy is getting to be an expensive business. There is no free lunch in this world, according to disciples of capitalism, and winning the hearts and minds of the electorate comes with a pretty hefty price-tag.

Considering the far-flung electorate and the scattered varied topography of Malaysia, the actual task for political parties to mount a cohesive national campaign must seem like a daunting task in terms of expenditure.

The number of human bodies to be mobilised, the means of transporting and sustaining these election workers, the production and distribution of campaign paraphernalia, and the procuring of actual votes in each constituency will all consume the kind of money far beyond the comprehension of ordinary voters.

Dropping names

Apparently, national party bosses and their senior most lieutenants are seldom directly involved in the unsavoury task of scrounging for campaign money. They are in such positions of power and responsibility, that they should not be bothered with this sort of mundane details, and should be freed instead to concentrate on urgent and important matters like drafting strategies, selecting candidates and inventing slogans.

The seedier business of procuring and managing campaign funds is best left to a cluster of faceless but loyal backroom boys, who would be close enough to the power centre to drop names on potential donors with credibility.

In this business of funding a struggle for power, the ruling parties have all the advantages of incumbency. Given the nature of our brand of money politics, too many businessmen are beholden to the politicians for their corporate health. More often than not, the big businessmen are the politicians, and the line between patron and client is blurred. In general, for the businessmen whose bread is buttered by political connections, election time is payback time. Or, in corporate language, it is reinvestment time.

Some odd businessmen will give to both sides, just in case. Out of one hand, they will contribute millions, and out of the other, mere thousands. I suppose there is no need for me to tell you which hand will go to which party.

In general, there is only so much that the BN national party headquarters can give, in the form of a sum of kick-start cash, and general publicity materials, like the big photographs of the prime minister. The rest of the huge burden of financing his campaign will fall entirely upon the shoulder of the candidate himself.

The independently wealthy candidate there are more than a few of these gold-gilded souls will have no problem financing their campaign. Their problem is to keep in abeyance greedy campaign agents who would take them for a ride.

Happy balance

How much is needed and spent by each candidate varies, depending on factors like the size of the constituency, the keenness of the contest, and the strength of the local party structure.

Nevertheless, in this murky business of winning elections and seats, and where political power itself is at stake, securing the hearts and minds of the voters does not really have a tangible price tag. You try to strike a happy balance between what you can afford, and what it takes to win. It is not always a happy balance for many contestants.

(One BN YB I know confessed to me that he spent over RM6 million in a rural constituency in Sarawak. Apparently, his election motto during the campaign period was never having to say ‘no’ to any potential supporters.)

In contrast, the poor opposition candidates have to fight his awesome BN opponent on a shoe-string budget. Except for some professionals and independently wealthy businessmen, most candidates in the opposition camps would have been marginalised economically.

I know of personalities in the opposition camp who spend mere thousands during an entire campaign. Sometimes, they even win seats. This is possible only in urban constituencies, when election messages can be spread easily through the press, by word of mouth, and through ceramahs. It would be unthinkable for their BN counterparts, especially those contesting in sparsely populated rural areas.

(The eternal shortage of campaign funds is partly the reason why the DAP has always been cocooned in the urban, and therefore, Chinese-majority areas.)

Why should BN candidates spend so much money when the entire government machinery has always been abused to provide campaign support? With such overwhelming odds stacked against opposition parties, surely it would be a breeze for even a cow that wears the BN symbol to garner vote effortlessly?

Times have changed

Indeed, I am given to understand by political veterans on both sides of the fence that elections were much simpler affairs in the 60s and 70s. Money politics had yet to rear its ugly head then. Political campaigns on both sides of the power divide depended very much on voluntary manpower and generous contribution from party supporters.

(Even in the 80s, when I contested as an opposition candidate, I could still commandeer the services and contributions of over 1000 volunteers on polling day. Not all BN workers were paid either.}

But, alas, the times have changed. Deep-seated cynicism has taken over electoral choices, following almost ten years of nearly double-digit economic growth since then. The tenets of capitalism have taken roots among emerging generations of voters. The predominant thinking among most young voters would be “what is in it for me?”, rather than “what can we do to make our country better?”

Over time, no thanks to the exaltations of campaigning politicians, the act of voting has become a sort of commercial transaction. The people are asked to support the BN, in exchange for stability, economic growth and development, conditions for them to seek personal advancement and family happiness. In exchange for these external goods, the people are quite happy to sign over a blank cheque over to their political leaders to do what they wish with the terrible powers of state, as long as it does not hurt them too much.

With the death of volunteerism and ideals in politics, money has become the prime motivation for participation in election campaigns. Why should anyone work for their political bosses for free, when people know very well that those political god-fathers get very fat during non-election years upon the advantage of their political office?

With so much riding on their being elected, or re-elected, the BN candidates simply cannot afford to lose. Their personal welfare, and the fortune of the network of vested interest under them, depends on their winning against the opposition. They have to win at all costs, no matter what it takes.

The secret towards winning any electoral contest is organisation. The control of the media in silencing and demonising the opposition can only do half the work. All that money spent on propaganda, through the numerous channels of creating a general mood and perception among the voters, will end up for naught, unless you also ensure that every available supporter turns out to vote, and every hostile or neutral voter is persuaded by all means available to swing their support your way.

Most important day

The fine art of election campaign has been honed to an organisational science. A good campaign machinery would be able to break down an entire constituency into manageable units, and individual voters in each unit will be approached, street by street, village by village, family by family, and all forms of persuasion are applied on them to cast their valuable vote for the candidate.

The most important day is actually polling day. Election agents are sometimes posted in individual houses, to prevent last minute change of minds, and to present their last minute offer of enticement. More often than not, means of transportation are also arranged, to herd the voters en mass to the polling stations. Nothing is ever left to chance.

As for the voters, they know this is the only time in five years, when their wish is a command upon the aspiring YB and his gang of paid cronies.

As one voter from a remote Sarawak village told me, “Before voting, everything is OK, but after the election, everything is KO!” Some voters collect badges from the contesting parties, to be worn proudly on various occasions, depending on which party happens to be campaigning in his area.

Many have no qualm asking for cash, but presentation of gifts in kind is equally welcome. Feasting with entertainment from pop stars are added bonuses. They are determined to milk the cow dry, while the carnival lasts. Who would have time for policy debates indeed!

The money required to oil this huge election machinery of a few thousand men and women, together with the huge expenses required to produce and present all the publicity materials, on top of enticing and transporting voters to the polling stations and back, will all add up to an astronomical sum.

As a result, more than a few candidates have gone into heavy debts after the elections are over. Some have gone bankrupt.

But generally, those BN YBs who have made it would consider such a five-yearly investment very much worth the effort. The subsequent returns would be phenomenal!

That is why I have predicted that the BN will win this general elections hands down, not merely because of what they can do for the people, but also because of their superiority in procuring election funds and running better campaign machinery.

Like many things in Malaysia, the concept of a level playing field is still alien to most people. Fair-play is only to be found in fairy tales. As long as there is no electoral reform in our country, general elections are pretty boring futile predictable exercises. What is expressed through the vote is not so much the general will of the people, but the collective greed of a people long corrupted by the avarice of their leaders.

About these ads

9 Comments »

  1. 50th ANNIVERSARY OF BRUNEI UPRISING FOR NORTH KALIMANTAN INDEPENDENCE -DECEMBER 8 1962

    Forgotten by many, the soothing sound of the rustling trees across the Borneo jungles recalls an earlier election & a major event in Northern Borneo/North Kalimantan history just passed on December 8 2012.

    50 years ago exactly on the same Saturday on December 8 1962 the anti-Malaysia Brunei Uprising led by the Brunei People’s Party under the leadership of A.M. Azahari broke out in Brunei.

    Early in December, Azahari announced that three motions would be proposed at the first meeting of the new Legislative Council:
    (i) Rejecting Malaysia.
    (ii) Requesting the restoration of Brunei sovereignty over Sarawak and North Borneo.
    (iii) Calling for a British grant of independence to a Borneo federation not later than 1963.

    In September 1962, the BPP won all except one of the electable seats in the Brunei Legislative Assembly in Brunei’s first free general election. The British refused to allow the BPP form government or entertain the above 3 independence demands. A peaceful solution was not possible. The Uprising planned but not properly organised and executed went ahead on December 8 1962 to liberate Brunei Sabah and Sarawak from British colonial rule and the spectre of anticipated Malayan domination and new colonial rule.

    The rest became history described reasonably accurately by George McTurnan Kahin, one of the most eminent of American
    Asian scholars, put it rather dramatically in his memoir of fifty years of study of the
    region as follows:

    “….. it was the rebellion that broke out on 8 December 1962 in the Sultanate of Brunei – slated at the time to be a component of the Malaysian federation – that precipitated the opposition of the Philippines and the Republic of Indonesia to it. Prior to the Brunei rebellion there was no clear indication that Indonesia or the Philippines would oppose Britain’s evolving plan for the creation of Malaysia, even if that federation incorporated the northern Borneo territories. But the Brunei uprising and
    its quick suppression by British troops flown in from Singapore and Malaya were clearly critical in sparking the open opposition of both Indonesia and the Philippines.”

    Without necessarily going all the way with George Kahin, there is no doubt that the Rebellion had significant consequences within the Sultanate on the position of the Sultan, on the issue of whether or not to join Malaysia and on the prospects for any form of democracy in the country. On the bigger or wider stage, it changed the nature of the British connection to Brunei, it was a prelude to Confrontation and it certainly helped to precipitate it.”

    This statement illustrates one point.

    The Indonesian Philippines opposition to the British Malayan proposal to form Malaysia followed the outbreak of the Brunei Uprising. They were following the lead of the North Kalimantan independence movement- not as misrepresented by the British of being the foreign “invasion threat” which Malaysia was designed to defend the Borneo territories.

    After 50 years, the eminent scholars of the world still largely maintain a silence and self-denial of the other confrontation sparked off by the Brunei Uprising- that of the guerrilla war in Sarawak for North Kalimantan independence. The Brunei Uprising and Sarawak guerrilla war was part and parcel of the same struggle by two not greatly dissimilar movements.

    Although the Brunei Uprising was quickly suppressed, its aim of independence was continued by Sarawak guerrilla forces led by the left wing independence movement. While the 2 movements may have been ideologically different they both agreed on the idea of uniting Brunei Sabah and Sarawak for independence.

    North Kalimantan is a political concept which Borneo intellectuals and others still support and promote in opposition to the new colonial Malaysia federation.

    The opposition to the British Malayan Malaysia proposal was based on the local aspirations for real independence and to oppose the plan to transfer colonial rule of the Borneo colonies to Malayan rule.

    The original Malaysia concept included Brunei North Borneo (now Sabah) Sarawak, Singapore and Malaya. This concept was revived from original plan to consolidate colonial rule of the 5 colonies by Britain in 1942. It was rejected by Rajah Vyner Brooke at the time when Sarawak was already an independent country. (This independence spirit was expressed in the local resistance to “cession” of Sarawak to British colonial rule and it became a major political issue in Sarawak in 1946 leading to the assassination of a British governor).

    The Malaysia concept immediately broke down with Brunei opting to stay out and Singapore soon left or was “expelled” in 1965. Many now say the Malaysia idea was dead by 1965. They are asking why remain in a corrupt and bankrupt union?

    They also see this break down as meaning that the current federation has not been legally constituted as it was not the original concept being imposed on Sabah and Sarawak. This was against what the local independence parties demanded. Along with Partai Rakyat Brunei and National Pasok Momogun Party, SUPP sent a memorandum to the United Nations demanding that the people of Northern Borneo be given right to self-determination and that the status of the area would be decided in a plebiscite. The independence referendum was never held by Britain and instead it carried out a mickey mouse “commission” to assess the people’s view on Malaysia. Although of some 2000 people interview in the 3 colonies only one third appeared to agree with the idea, Britain and Malaya (without consulting North Borneo and Sarawak) announced they were proceeding with the formation of Malaysia.

    Malaya itself has repudiated the Malaysia Agreement and 18/20 Points Agreements by its total breach of their terms and conditions. Instead of “Borneonisation” UMNO has “Malayanised” and plundered Sabah and Sarawak under its Malay supremacist religious apartheid transformation of local politics and social relationships with the New Economic Plan.

    Further if Brunei was free not to “join” and Singapore was free to leave why cannot Sabah and Sarawak.

    Furthermore the British always portrayed Malaysia as a “free and voluntary” union. If so why cannot Sabah and Sarawak choose to freely separate from Malaya?

    The struggle for independence by Sabah and Sarawak has equal relevance today as on December 8 1962. The plunder and exploitation of the 2 colonies by UMNO to develop Malaya has plunged the 2 countries into extreme poverty (equal partners with Malaya by dominated and ruled by the Malaya).

    In stark contrast are Brunei and Singapore where the people are enjoying the real fruits of independence. The Brunei people are better looked after with proper housing and public facilities and Singaporeans now boast of having the per capita income in the world.

    So we can judge for ourselves- are we still wanting to be in a bankrupt union called Malaysia OR take our countries out for real independence and work for a better life like Brunei and Singapore. That is a choice we all can make.

    In lieu of any available account by the BPP on the anti-Malaysia uprising this Wikipedia account provides a reasonable background to the events:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunei_Revolt

    An account of the uprising by a Brunei scholar-

    http://us.macmillan.com/rebellioninbrunei/AbdulMajid\\]

    You Tube interview of AM Azahari Chairman of the Brunei People’s Party

    The concept of “North Kalimantan”-

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._M._Azahari

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Borneo_Federation

    The concluding comment in this article is a deliberate misrepresentation of reality as the incumbent ruling BPP BN party got re-elected through electoral fraud.

    Political parties- the Brunei People’s Party- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunei_People%27s_

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarawak_United_Peoples%27_Party

    Along with Partai Rakyat Brunei and National Pasok Momogun Party, SUPP sent a memorandum to the United Nations demanding that the people of Northern Borneo be given right to self-determination and that the status of the area would be decided in a plebiscite.[1]

    Another part of our history- Role played by the leftwing independence movement

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Kalimantan_Communist_Party

    Bruneian reflections & comments here: http://bruneiresources.blogspot.com.au/2006/05/50-years-ago.html

    Comment by Anonymous — December 9, 2012 @ 12:29 PM | Reply

  2. SKY I am a not so educated Iban ( only form 3 lah) from Penrissen and I work as a JTA with DID. I have voted in 4 general and state elections. Yes, I have taken money from BN’s reps and agents who wanted my “help” but I have never sold my soul and my vote. The Dayak community is still lagging far behind and development in my area are sadly none.

    Comment by Bayor — December 9, 2012 @ 8:28 AM | Reply

    • Many can sympathize with En.Bayor.

      Still many can say his sincerely has been forsaken, he’s been taken advantage of and such an act is treachery. On a greater level where its equated with nationalist or ethnic cultural emotions and feelings ….its downright treason. Only grossly inadequate people take advantage of others. And inadequacy is staring Malaysians straight in their faces while the country is so richly endowed there’s enough and more for all with genuine skills. talent and a good heart.

      We all try to find courage and honor in ourselves where the only justification is the same expectation in others.

      Comment by sama-sama — December 9, 2012 @ 10:42 PM | Reply

    • Rural voters , be they Iban, Orang Ulu, Melanau or Bidayuh, have matured politically and know the folly of not voting or voting a corrupted government in exchange for development or handouts. Many have realised that is is the BN government which has been grabbing their NCR lands, uprooting and misplacing them and marginalised the community.

      Comment by Bidayuh Headmaster — December 10, 2012 @ 12:06 AM | Reply

  3. There’s been a drought of reasonably-priced beer in Sarawak ever since the beginning of Ramadhan. I’ve read in the papers about several large seizures of (presumably) un-dutied beer by customs agents. Word on the street is that Federal agents were involved. Ex-policeman have explained to me that seized contraband is auctioned off. I am predicting that just before the election we’re going to see Sarawak awash in tasty beer at *very* popular prices. If They give you a crate, enjoy, and then vote Pakatan.

    Comment by Reader — December 9, 2012 @ 6:56 AM | Reply

  4. Thanks for bringing out this collective greed of the people. Has this nation morphe into such a sorry state. Then, the ideals of the forerunner leaders of this country are going down the drain together with the Monsoon rain. Do we need a Mahatma Gandi or another Tunku A Rahman and even a Lee Kuan Yew, to reverse this adverse trend? The people must decide as time is running short.

    Comment by Li Li Fa — December 9, 2012 @ 6:55 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Get a free blog at WordPress.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 444 other followers

%d bloggers like this: