Hornbill Unleashed

June 15, 2013

Opposition gets flak from Masing over NCR land survey

Churchill Edward, @theborneopost.com

Land Development Minister Tan Sri Dr James Masing yesterday hit out at the opposition for harping on issues over perimeter survey on native customary rights (NCR) land.

The Baleh assemblyman said the opposition will be bankrupt of ideas if land issue is taken away from their political means to bring down the government of the day.

Masing said the opposition knew very well that land issue is sensitive and by twisting the fact they were hoping to make the people become emotional and irrational.

“They (opposition) just want to look relevant. They can’t allow NCR land issue to die a natural death because they will too die a natural death,” the Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president told The Borneo Post yesterday.

Most NCR land owners however know what they actually want from the government and are glad that the perimeter survey on NCR land is initiated, he pointed out.

“The first thing we should ask ourselves (NCR land owners) is that what do we want? Obviously the answer would be to distinguish what is NCR land and what is state land as we (NCR land owners) want to avoid quarrelling with the state government. Then the next thing to go for is of course perimeter survey pursuant to getting certainty of ownership,” he said.

“We should get NCR land surveyed once and for all, then only will we know exactly the total acreage of NCR land we are having,” he added.

Masing opined that it would be wise for NCR land owners to get their Temuda and Tembawai surveyed first rather than Pemakai Menua and Pulau Galau.

“Why should they want to get the Pemakai Menua and Pulau Galau surveyed first when almost 90 per cent of the NCR land are in fact Temuda and Tembawai? Fight for the survey of what is yours (Temuda and Tembawai) first before thinking of getting Pemakai Menua and Pulau Galau – which made up on only 10 per cent of the overall NCR land in Sarawak – be surveyed first. Why fight for the 10 per cent only to lose the 90 per cent in the end?” he pointed out.

Pemakai Menua is an Iban term referring to a territorial domain of a longhouse community where customary rights to land resource were created by pioneering ancestors.

Pulau Galau – an Iban term referring to a communal reserve purposely left reserved, uncleared and unfarmed for future resources by longhouse community.

Temuda is also an Iban term referring to cultivated land that has been left to fallow for a certain period of time while Tembawai refers to old longhouse site.

On the issue of whether Section 6 that governs perimeter survey of communal or traditional village land should be used first rather than Section 18 (one governing perimeter survey on individual NCR plots), Masing said he prefers the survey to be systematic, starting with perimeter survey under Section 6 as it will save time and money apart from being extensive.

And after that is done, survey on individual NCR lands can be conducted under Section 18, he added.

He said he had never suggested that Section 6 substitute Section 18, stressing all he wanted was for land matters to be handled systematically and economically.

“Section 18 will take longer time and is very expensive to implement while Section 6 takes less time and covers bigger area, for instance communal area of a longhouse or village, but after the Section 6 implementation, individual survey under Section 18 can be carried out,” he reiterated.

“Section 6 and Section 18 are on the process of surveying NCR land but the end result is still the same. Security on NCR land is assured,” he added.

Last Monday, Masing called on the Land and Survey Department to expedite the implementation of the NCR land perimeter survey initiative. He highlighted the need for the department to be more aggressive and urgent in completing the surveying work and ensure that the 2015 target is achieved.

He feared that the surveying work was conducted at quite a slow pace in some areas of the state.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. Correct! Temuda and Tembawai land do not have much (if any) marketable timbers because both have been cleared for farming and building of longhouses. Whereas, Pemakai Menua and Pulau Galau basically still “virgin forested areas” still have abundant marketable trees. That is why the authorities insisted to leave the Pulau Galau and Pemakai Menua to later (if ever) stage. Pulau Galau and Pemakai Menua are either within or at the edge of Temuda and/or Tembawai land and should be surveyed together. Afterall, the authorities claimed its only 10% of NCR Land. Don’t forget that mobilization of L&S Surveyors to one particular locality (1) to survey under Section 6; and (2) to survey under Section 18, will double its mobilization cost. If the L&S Department out-source surveying job it will involve greater cost. The process leading to the issuance of individual land title involves various steps, different categories of experties/personnel, etc. To reduce cost perimeter survey must be done on all categories of NCR Land (Temuda, Tembawai, Pemakai Menua and Pulau Galau) at one time on one particular locality/claim, period!

    Comment by edward, m — June 15, 2013 @ 4:19 PM | Reply

  2. Masing, you got it wrong. The temuda and temuai are within the pemakai menua. Don’t try to fool us into accepting too little when you definitely know that the state government which you are part off don’t even recognised our NCR lands. Remember the ” Dayaks are squatters” video expose? Go ask them why they dare say so and you will know what taib evil plan is towards our vast ancestral inheritance.

    Our Pemakai menua is part of that inheritance but did you know that the state government of which you are part off do not recognized that as Native owned? Why are you so willing to support taib in his quest to terminate your ownership to your ancestors lands? Are you feeling inferior to him being your Boss. You must remember, not all Dayaks in sarawak voted for you two to be our leaders. People in Sematan, Lawas, Bakelalan and Baram did not vote for you two. You were only voted by those in your constituency so do not think that all Dayaks support you in your ball polishing and self presevations!

    Comment by brian — June 15, 2013 @ 12:14 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: