Hornbill Unleashed

February 25, 2014

Idris: 10-point fix not against state Islamic laws

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 7:21 AM
Tags: , , , , ,


The 10-point solution outlined by the cabinet in 2011 does not contradict various state enactments outlawing use of the Bible for propagation, and the Court of Appeal’s decision on the ‘Allah’ ban, said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Idris Jala.

While noting that the issue is highly sensitive, Idris (left), in his opinion piece published by Kinibiz today, explained that the 10-point fix does not condone non-Muslims propagating non-Islamic faiths to Muslims.

“In other words, the Alkitab is allowed on a conditional basis that is for use by Christians, their churches and congregations and non-Muslims.

“However, if anyone uses the Alkitab or uses any of the prohibited words to propagate non-Islamic faiths to Muslims, then he will contravene the relevant Islamic laws,” said Idris, one of the architects behind the 10-point solution announced in April 2011.

Idris felt the 10-point solution can co-exist with Islamic state enactments, although he is aware there are people who view the co-existence is imperfect.

The 10-point solution allows the importation and printing of the Alkitab in Bahasa Malaysia or indigenous languages, to be used in churches in Sabah and Sarawak.

“In summary, the 10-point solution permits the Alkitab, conditionally in Peninsular Malaysia but unconditionally in Sabah and Sarawak. It does not condone the propagation of non-Muslim faiths to Muslims, whether or not they use any of these prohibited words.”

In explaining further, he said it is not an offence for non-Muslims to sing the Selangor anthem, which contains the word ‘Allah’ in the lyrics because merely singing or uttering them in the anthem does not constitute “propagation”.

In the case of Catholic weeklyThe Herald, the minister said it is based on the use of powers accorded to the home minister under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, which is to prohibit use of the word ‘Allah’ in the Bahasa Malaysia version of the publication of the newsletter.

“In this case, the home minister has used his discretionary power in accordance with the law, upon being satisfied that the use of the word ‘Allah’ inThe Herald’s publication could cause sensitivities, which in turn threatens public order and security.

“The Court of Appeal has ruled that the use of the word ‘Allah’ in the Alkitab is different from its use in The Herald newspaper as seen from the distribution angle of the publications,” Idris said.

Torching of churches

The Bible or Alkitab, Idris said, is allowed on condition that it be used in the church and for the Christian community, while The Herald is a newsletter that can be accessed by all.

Based on those facts, the usage may result in religious sensitivity and ultimately threaten public order and security.

He said the incidents of the torching of some churches in Peninsular Malaysia have been cited as evidence in the court hearing at the appellate court.

Idris said the court in allowing the appeal by the Home Ministry, ruled:

• The minister acted in accordance with his discretionary power in accordance with the law. The minister was also found not to be acting outside established principles for his decision to be set aside by the court.

• The executive is the best body to decide on matters of public order and security. In this case, the court found the High Court had erred when deciding that there is no evidence to show that there has been a threat to public order and security.

The appellate court further concluded that the law allows the minister to make decisions without waiting for threats or violence and is sufficient should there potentially be an occurrence of threat to public order and security. The court also took into account the violence that occurred after the High Court’s decision.

• That the prohibition of the use of the word ‘Allah’ in the Bahasa Malaysia version of The Herald, which is a translation of the English word – “God” in a newspaper, will not prevent the Christian community from practicing their religion and therefore does not violate the right to freedom of religion under Article 11 of the Federal Constitution.

However despite the COA decision, Idris believes differences or conflicts on religious issues are best dealt with via dialogue and discussions rather than through the courts.


  1. Idris said “the 10-point fix does not condone non-Muslims propagating non-Islamic faiths to Muslims.” So is he saying that the Bible Society, by keeping a supply of Bibles in BM at its office, was condoning propogating of Christianity to Muslims” If so, please tell us his KPI and his NKRA how he has measured how many Muslims had been confused by the so many Bibles kept at the Bible Society? Also tell us how many Muslims must be confused before such action by JAIS can be justified.

    Furthermore “Idris felt the 10-point solution can co-exist with Islamic state enactments, although he is aware there are people who view the co-existence is imperfect.” Who asked him whether it was perfect or imperfect? The 10-point Solution was his 10-point Solution. But now he tells us it is not a solution, like that it is a suggestion only. Solution or suggestion? Idris must answer because he led the participants into trusting the Solution.

    Comment by Pohchee Kay — February 27, 2014 @ 6:29 PM | Reply

  2. Religious ideologies are on trials in Malaysia ? What a wonderful world? CAR was a peaceful country in Africa where Christians and Muslims co-exist peacefully in the past. When the minority Muslim overthrew the Christians dominated government the country was thrown to anarchy and slaughters. Then the Christians raised up to gain control, the entire Muslim were driven from the homes. Unlucky Muslims were slaughtered. Malaysia is still considered a peaceful country where various faiths can co-exist and the question is why should any religion or race should think they have the right to impose their views on others by any means they can grab hold of? Via creating laws,restrictions and endless means to justify their dominance over others.

    Comment by loyarburok — February 25, 2014 @ 1:09 PM | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: