Hornbill Unleashed

July 1, 2014

Even the Quran says ‘Allah’ used by Christians and Jews, High Court told

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 8:00 AM
Tags: , , , , ,

BSM representative Alfred Tais (left) with Jill Ireland's lawyers Annou Xavier and Datuk Kenny Ng, at the High Court today. – The Malaysian Insider pic by  Shafiq Safiee, June 30, 2014.JENNIFER GOMEZ

A lawyer, representing a Sarawakian Christian challenging the home ministry’s seizure of her religious compact discs for containing the word “Allah”, has questioned the ministry’s justification that the term was exclusive to Islam and Muslims.

Nizam Bashir told the High Court today that an officer from the ministry had clearly acted on an incorrect basis of fact.

Nizam quoted from affidavits of experts submitted in the case, stressing that the Quran contains references to Christians and Jews using the word “Allah” as a reference to God in affirmative and in encouraging terms.

Meanwhile, lead counsel Lim Heng Seng said the case was not about Christianity against Islam, but the constitutional right of Ireland as a native Bumiputera Christian.

“Are we a nation governed by rule of law or religious bureaucracy?” Lim submitted before Judge Datuk Zaleha Yusof today in the judicial review application to quash the home ministry’s order in withholding the religious CDs.

The Home Ministry seized Ireland’s eight CDS while she was on her way back from Indonesia via the Sepang low cost carrier terminal on May 11, 2008.

They were seized under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 on the basis that there were prohibited terms, prejudicial to public order and were in breach of the Malaysia Islamic Development Department (Jakim) guidelines.

In August 2008, Ireland filed a judicial review for an order to quash the home minister’s ‎order and for her CDs to be returned.

Lim submitted today that the home minister cannot be influenced by Jakim, a third party, in exercising his discretion.

“There is a clear separation of powers between federal and state so why is the officer of the minister taking it upon herself to decide on whether the word Allah is not for non-Muslims?” Lim questioned.

Lim also pointed out that there was no proof that Ireland’s use of the CDS would cause public disorder.

Lim added that in the Federal Court ruling in the Herald case, chief justice Tun Arifin Zakaria had noted that the views expressed by the Court of Appeal judges on theological issues were merely obiter dicta, meaning that is it only an opinion and is non-binding as precedent.

As such, Lim submitted today that ‎it was not for this court to consider the theological aspects.

He also pointed out that the federal government had said that the Herald case ruling was limited to the publication and did not go beyond it.

Meanwhile lawyer Philip Koh who held a watching brief for the Malaysian Consultative Council of Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) submitted that the interfaith group was concerned over the case as it infringed on freedom to practise one’s faith.

He added that the word Allah was also contained in the holy book of the Sikhs since the time the religion was founded.

Koh also said that Federal Court panel judge Tan Sri Richard Malanjum had also raised this issue in his dissenting judgement in the Herald case last week.

Koh added that MCCBCHST, which represented all the main non-Muslim religions in Malaysia, was in solidarity with Ireland, in that the use of religious materials in the practise of one’s faith cannot be subject to seizure.

Meanwhile, senior federal counsel Munahyza Mustafa submitted that the minister had exercised his power under the Printing Act which gives him power to withhold the material if it is likely to be prejudicial to public order.

“The home minister was satisfied that the use of the word in the CDs may cause harm to public order as well as cause religious sensitivity among Christians and Muslims in Malaysia.

“In Islam, Allah is based on the concept of Oneness but this is not the same in Christianity which follows the concept of Trinity,” she said.

The High Court set July 21 for decision.

4 Comments »

  1. These people don’t care about what any holy book says as long as they can use and abuse religion to remain in power. To remain in power means more easy meals so the heck with what the holy book says! What do we expect from people who used fake professors and fake religious experts to further their cause?….Nothing GOOD!

    Comment by Brian — July 1, 2014 @ 3:47 PM | Reply

  2. Bad culture + prolong consumption of NEP drug = Uncivilized and easily confused … even God cannot help them

    Comment by tigerykey — July 1, 2014 @ 1:33 PM | Reply

  3. You suckers are wasting your time on this exercise in futility. Wake up! This is not some school intellectual debate against some esteemed opponent where both sides play by the same set of rules. Your opponents have no scruples and go by the law of the jungle. What rules are you playing by, suckers?

    Comment by Hornbill Leashed and Gagged — July 1, 2014 @ 10:12 AM | Reply

    • Ha ha. This is the retribution for Sarawakians who have been fixed depositors of BN.

      Comment by Zizi — July 1, 2014 @ 3:50 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: