Hornbill Unleashed

August 8, 2016

Court of Appeal dismisses bid for RCI on prison reforms

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 8:00 PM

Lawyer P.Uthayakumar, said among others, that prisoners at all prisons nationwide should be given healthcare and medical treatment by specialists. — AFP picThe Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal brought by lawyer P.Uthayakumar over his bid for a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) to be set up to look into prison reforms in Malaysia.

Uthayakumar was seeking for the Court of Appeal to reverse the High Court decision on February 17 this year which dismissed his application.

A three-man panel led by Justice Datuk Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat ruled that Uthayakumar’s appeal was incompetent because his application was not properly brought before the High Court.

She allowed the preliminary objection raised by deputy public prosecutor Awang Amardajaya Awang Mahmud, who submitted that Uthayakumar had used the wrong mode of proceedings to file his application.

Justice Tengku Maimun, who presided with Justices Datuk Mohd Zawawi Salleh and Datuk Ahmadi Asnawi, held that the prosecution’s preliminary objection had merit.

In his application, Uthayakumar had sought for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, with the Attorney-General’s  advice, to propose to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to establish the commission.

He named Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Prisons director-general Datuk Seri Zulkifli Omar, Kajang Prison director Abdul Wahab Abdul Kassim, the Attorney-General and the Malaysian government as respondents.

In the application, Uthayakumar, said among others, that prisoners at all prisons nationwide should be given healthcare and medical treatment by specialists.

Uthayakumar was sentenced to 30 months jail for sedition by a Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur in 2013.

He was, however, released from prison in October 2014 after the Court of Appeal reduced his jail term to 24 months.

At the appeal proceeding, Awang Amardajaya submitted the matter was not a criminal matter and that Uthayakumar should have filed the application at the Civil High Court and not at the Criminal High Court.

Uthayakumar contended that his application was correctly filed in accordance with the law as he said the matter arose from his criminal conviction.

Met outside the court later, Uthayakumar said he would appeal against the decision at the Federal Court.


Bernama


Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: