Hornbill Unleashed

October 25, 2016

More ‘ayes’ to making Sarawak equal partner in Federation

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 9:02 PM

james-masing_Abdul-Karim-RahmanTwo Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders see the proposed motion in the Sarawak Assembly on Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution as a timely move.

“We cannot and shouldn’t take it anymore,” said Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) President James Masing. “With the tabling of the motion, it will ‘wake up’ Putrajaya to our rights.”

Sarawak, added Masing, had “enough” of being short-changed by Malaya over the last 53 years.

“The motion to reclaim Sarawak’s rights is timely,” said Masing, who is also deputy chief minister, according to a report in the Borneo Post.

There is a move by Sarawak leaders to restore Article 1(2) to its pre-13 July 1976 position, making Sarawak an equal partner in the federation and not just another state.

Meanwhile PBB Supreme Council Member Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said in a statement: “Malaysia was formed based on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and related constitutional documents. All parties must respect these documents.”

Masing and Abdul Karim were expressing confidence that the opposition would back the motion proposed by Chief Minister Adenan Satem. Two earlier motions, on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and oil and gas, were passed unanimously.

Sabah and Sarawak, before the amendment, were equal partners of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia.

After the amendment, Sabah and Sarawak were placed as the 12th and 13th states in the federation.

The Motion, Karim who is also state assistant minister of housing, said, was not only about MA63 but also the Inter-Governmental Committee Report (IGC) 1962/63 and the Cobbold Commission Report 1962, among others.

He argued it would be wrong to take the position that constitutional documents on Malaysia were no longer relevant with the Federal Constitution in place, according to the Borneo Post report.

The bottom line, he said, was that many of Sarawak’s rights (as those of Sabah) had been eroded over the years.

“This has to be corrected,” summed up Karim. “The proposed motion is the first step,” he was quoted as saying.

Source : FMT Reporters Online



  1. The 1976 amendment ultra vires the Malaysia Agreement 1963 so is null and void!

    Comment by Al — October 26, 2016 @ 6:28 PM | Reply

    • Afterall, th eMalaysia Agreement is an international treaty (a copy has been deposutyed at the UN Archive at its HQ in New York) and international laws overide others!

      Comment by Al — October 26, 2016 @ 6:28 PM | Reply

  2. Timely move…..hahaha. YB Baru has been on this issue the day he was elected YB and years later like now, the BN ybs jumped on the bandwagon to take advanrage of the people sentiments and loud cries and called it timely move?😈

    Comment by Brian — October 26, 2016 @ 1:07 PM | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: