Hornbill Unleashed

October 28, 2016

See Chee How: Sabah, Sarawak motion strong message to Putrajaya  

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 9:03 PM

see-chee-howArticle 1(2) of the Federal Constitution could be amended if there’s a strong motion from Sarawak that will compel the Federal government to table a Bill on the matter in Parliament, Batu Lintang Assemblyman See Chee How said at a press conference yesterday.

He was referring to the status of Sabah and Sarawak in the Federation under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).

See said that if there’s no such Bill pushed through by the government, then any MP can put in a Private Member’s Bill on the amendment, The Borneo Post reported today.

If the Sarawak Assembly reaches a unanimous motion on the matter, and Putrajaya does nothing, then the Sarawak government can no longer continue to support the Federal government, added See who is Sarawak PKR vice-chairman and a lawyer.

See said the motion, to be introduced in the Sarawak Assembly next month, was very significant.

“It will send a strong message to the Federal government,” he was quoted as saying by the Sarawak-based daily.

See also said that he was happy Chief Minister Adenan Satem had confirmed the Sarawak government would be introducing the motion in the state assembly.

He said it would be ideal if there was a bi-partisan committee to draft the motion but so far there has been no such development.

“That’s why the opposition will be filing a motion as well despite Adenan’s announcement on it.

“Then, the matter of what’s lacking in either motion can be raised during the debate on it.”

He said the opposition would support the government’s motion if it concerns the territory and rights of Sarawak under MA63, the Inter-Governmental Committee Report and the Cobbold Commission Report.

See went on to remind that the 13 July 1976 amendment to Article 1(2) in Parliament was a breach of MA63.

“Those who signed MA63 were not involved. Therefore, the amendment is null and void.”

See also called MA63 an international agreement and treaty signed by five governments and lodged with the UN Secretary-General. MA63 was signed by North Borneo, Sarawak, Singapore, Malaya and the United Kingdom.

However, the jury is still out on whether it was a Trust Deed as well given the fact that the process of decolonisation was not completed in Borneo in 1963.

Before 13 July 1976, Sabah and Sarawak were equal partners of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia (not Malaya).

After the amendment, Sabah and Sarawak, according to the Federal Constitution, became the 12th and 13th states in the Federation of Malaya (now Malaysia).

Article 160 of the Federal Constitution defines “Federation” as that set up by the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948 and reinforced by the Federation of Malaya Independence Act 1957.


Source : FMT Reporters Online


10 Comments »

  1. The motion to restore the rights of Sarawak and Sabah in the respective Dewan Undangan Negeri was long overdue and never too late. Sarawakians and Sabahans are not fools and we must not be slaves to UMNO Baru controlled Putrajaya. We must be united in our resolves to regain our identity, dignity and rights.

    Comment by Mata Kuching — October 30, 2016 @ 12:04 PM | Reply

  2. Cannot count on Sarawakians to upset Najib.

    Comment by Aifa — October 29, 2016 @ 9:08 PM | Reply

  3. All documents related to the Malaysia Agreemnet 1963 can be found at the UK govt archives, the KLew Records Office
    http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C5068229

    Comment by Pet — October 29, 2016 @ 6:01 PM | Reply

  4. Malaysia Agreemnet 1963 is no longer valid for three legal reasons:

    1. Brunei withdrawal one day before the signing of the agreement. According tp Queen Counsel Anthony (who by the way is the current COmmonwealth advisor to the UK govt), an agreement become null and void should one of the parties decides to withdraw, esp at the last minute.

    http://charleshector.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/malaysia-agreement-20-pointsabah-and-18.html

    2. Spore withdrawal has made the MA 1963 null and void.

    3. That the Msian govt has not honour and respect provisions in the agreement can cause th MA1963 to be null and void.

    The Sarawak govt should go to the internayional court of justice or even ask for advisory opinion from the ICJ. or egage QC Anthony from UK as advisor.

    Comment by Pet — October 29, 2016 @ 5:59 PM | Reply

  5. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1963/35

    Comment by Pet — October 29, 2016 @ 5:51 PM | Reply

  6. Sarawak BN lawmakers ‘ adoration of Najib, despite 1MDB being the country’s largest financial scandals implicating Najib himself, was to be blamed for Umno Baru controlled Putrajaya’s cold shoulders to the needs of Sarawakians and our demand for compliance of the 18 points Malaysia Agreement.

    Comment by Sabri Yaman — October 29, 2016 @ 4:13 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: