Hornbill Unleashed

March 26, 2017

Any laws contradicting Islamic scriptures invalid, ex-CJ claims

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 8:01 AM

Former Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Abdul Halim speaks at a special lecture on Islam as the law of the land at the Majestic Hotel in Kuala Lumpur, March 25, 2017. — Picture by Choo Choy MayAny laws which run contrary to Islamic scriptures are null and void, said a controversial former chief justice who had once proposed that the English Common Law be replaced by Shariah laws.

In a lecture on “Islam as the law of the land”, former chief justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Abdul Halim had interpreted that the supremacy of Shariah laws is only second to the Federal Constitution.

“I feel anything which is in contradiction to Islam is unconstitutional,” Ahmad Fairuz said.

“The privy council has ruled in a case in Singapore that a law, to be valid, must conform to the fundamental rules laid down by the English law,” he related, saying that this view was then also adopted by Malaysia.

“However, as Islam is the federal religion, surely the fundamental principles of the law should be based not only on the English Common law, but on the Shariah,” he added.

Ahmad Fairuz said that the Islamic holy book of Quran, and the Sunnah, the traditions and practices Prophet Muhammad, are the main source of Islamic laws.

He then claimed that reading Articles 3 and 4 in the Constitution together means that any laws contradicting Islamic scriptures are void.

Article 3 states that “Islam is the religion of the Federation”, while Article 4 states that “Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation” and any law passed after Independence and inconsistent with it shall be void.

“And hence, laws that are against the Quran and Sunnah is null and void,” he said.

The lecture today was co-organised by the Malaysian Lawyers Circle, Malaysian Muslim Lawyers Association, Concerned Lawyers for Justice, Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia’s legal arm iPeguam, and the Centre for Human Rights Research and Advocacy.

In his speech, Ahmad Fairuz also lamented that Malaysia’s laws are “antique” as it is based on the English Common Law which was administered in 1956.

“So antique are our laws. We have been independent since 1957, but this is still rooted in our laws. Sad,” he said adding that those who practicee it, are being “colonised in their minds”.

The former judge had proposed the idea since 2007, comparing it to Sections 3 and 5 of the Civil Law Act that permit judges to import English Common Law to fill in the country’s judiciary gaps.

In September that year, Ahmad Fairuz was implicated in the V. K. Lingam video scandal. He retired two months later and was succeeded by Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamad.


Source : YISWAREE PALANSAMY @ Malay Mail Online


Advertisements

5 Comments »

  1. Fuk your pig brain. If a learned man like the former CJ could be so stupid and an incorrigible bigot who is Abang Johari to assure Sarawakians that hudud under an enhanced syariah law will not affect Sarawak at all?

    Comment by Awaken Dayak — March 28, 2017 @ 10:50 PM | Reply

  2. Stupid and uncivilised

    Comment by tigeryk — March 26, 2017 @ 11:20 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: