Hornbill Unleashed

June 17, 2017

1MDB says DoJ suit lacks firm evidence

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 8:02 AM

1mdb1MDB says the latest civil suit filed by the US Justice Department (DoJ) seeking to seize some US$540 million worth of assets allegedly linked to money stolen from the troubled firm lacks firm evidence.

“1MDB notes that the civil lawsuit does not contain any appendices with documentary proof or witness statements to support the allegations made by the DoJ,” it said in a statement today.

It added that it had not been contacted by the DoJ regarding the matter and was not a party to the suit.

The DoJ’s move compounded court cases launched last year in which Washington sought to confiscate more than US$1 billion allegedly embezzled by businessmen with political connections in Malaysia, bringing the total amount US officials say was stolen to US$4.5 billion.

The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) dismissed the move, saying the allegations were aimed at smearing certain individuals and had arisen from input by political opponents.

In a press statement today, the prime minister’s press secretary Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad said: “We are also concerned by the unnecessary and gratuitous naming of certain matters and individuals that are only relevant to domestic political manipulation and interference. This suggests a motivation that goes beyond the objective of seizing assets.”

Attorney-General Mohamed Apandi Ali also hit out at the claims, saying neither Malaysian nor international authorities investigating 1MDB had furnished any evidence of misappropriated funds.

He also said no charges had been brought against Prime Minister Najib Razak, who until last year was the chairman of 1MDB’s advisory board.

Najib, who has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with 1MDB, was cleared by Apandi on Jan 26, 2016.

In the statement today, 1MDB reiterated that it would “fully cooperate with any foreign lawful authority, subject to international protocols governing such matters and the advice of the relevant domestic lawful authorities”.


Source : FMT Online


Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. 1MDB is not the judge but defendant. What bloody right does the defendant to give verdict.

    Comment by Eugene Low — June 18, 2017 @ 5:00 AM | Reply

  2. Mrs MO1, you can immediately instruct your lawyers to take legal action against the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) as they have claimed that “US$27.3 million (of the US$620 million from the misappropriated 1MDB funds) was used to buy a 22-carat pink diamond pendant and necklace for “MO1’s wife.” That’s horrible slander so quickly initiate legal action to defend your glorious good name as we all know you have saved up since you were little to buy that 22-carat pink diamond pendant and necklace.

    Comment by Hattan — June 17, 2017 @ 3:51 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: