Hornbill Unleashed

June 6, 2010

Malay Nationalists Trash Najib’s Economic Plan

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak gets a cold reception

Just how difficult it will be to modify Malaysia’s affirmative action program for its majority ethnic Malays came clear over the weekend when some 1,500 members of the Malay Consultative Council summarily rejected Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s plans to replace it with what the premier calls the New Economic Model.

Najib was due to unveil his NEM, as he calls it, on June 10 in conjunction with the publication of the 10th Malaysia Plan. But so far no details have been released, with less than two weeks to go before its publication, and it is questionable what will be in it. The consultative council turned it down without bothering with the details.

Since he came into office as premier in April of 2009, Najib has been attempting to get Malays, who make up roughly 60 percent of the country’s 27 million people, to give up some of the perks that they have enjoyed since the New Economic Policy was promulgated in the wake of bloody 1969 riots that took the lives of hundreds of Malays and Chinese alike. Modifying the NEP, originally designed to remain in place only until 1990, has become the third rail of Malay politics.

The vote of the council, made up of 76 Malay-rights organizations, amounts to a stinging rebuke of the prime minister’s policy even before it is announced. Ibrahim Ali, the head of Perkasa, the most strident of the Malay nationalist organizations and an ally of former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, told Najib publicly that the vote amounted to a vote of no-confidence in him. Rather than ratifying in principle Najib’s plans, the council instead passed a 31-point resolution demanding that the essentials of the NEP remain in place.

In particular, the Malay Consultative Council is demanding guarantees of what they call the special rights of ethnic Malays in return for granting citizenship to non-Malays – who have been here for generations. Chinese make up about 25 percent of the population, Indians another 8 percent, with the rest other races. Critics say that amounts to apartheid by another name.

The National Economic Advisory Council, hand-picked by Najib to write the new economic framework, came under particular fire. The NEAC, as it is known, is made up of nine academicians, economic experts and consultants including some of Malaysia’s most distinguished economists. However, Ibrahim told the conference, some of the members are non-Malays who would have no way of knowing the Malay soul, and the Malays who are there are liberals who have forgotten their roots.

The prime minister’s cause probably wasn’t helped much by the Saturday release of the annual Forbes List of richest Malaysians. Of the top 10, eight are Chinese and not a single one is an ethnic Malay. Second on the list, after Robert Kuok with US$12 billion in assets, is telecommunications tycoon Tatparanandam Ananda Krishnan, an ethnic Indian. At eighth is the only other non-Chinese, Syed Mokhtar AlBukhyary,who is of Arab descent.

The Forbes List of Malaysia’s 10 Richest

1) Robert Kuok; US$12 billion
2) T. Ananda Krishnan; US$8.1 billion
3) Lee Shin Cheng; US$4.6 billion
4) Sri Lee Kim Hua; US$3.9 billion
5) Quek Leng Chan; US$3.85 billion
6) Teh Hong Piow; US$3.8 billion
7) Yeoh Tiong Lay; US$2.5 billion
8) Syed Mokhtar AlBukhary; US$1.7 billion
9) Vincent Tan; US$1.6 billion
10) Tiong Hiew King; US$1.2 billion

The vote presents Najib with a seemingly insoluble political dilemma. He needs to eliminate costly subsidies that stifle both personal and corporate competitiveness. According to one account, in 2009 the government spent RM74 billion (US$22.7 billion) in subsidies for sugar, fuel and other items. Subsidy expenditure was 11 percent of nominal gross domestic product according to these figures between 2006 and 2009. But as Badawi learned, cutting subsidies is dangerous. A cut in fuel subsidies contributed to his unpopularity.

Najib’s move last year to cut a long-standing requirement mandating ethnic Malay participation in 27 economic sub-sectors and remove another that 30 percent of shares in IPOs go to ethnic Malays was one of the developments led to rising Malay irritation. His weekend comments to the Consultative Congress that the government is still in the process of gathering feedback before implementing his new policy – just 11 days before it is supposed to be tabled – is an indication that he and his advisors have little idea of how to do it.

In particular, while there has been no break with former Prime Minister Mahathir, Mahathir has been attending Perkasa rallies and in some cases leading them, and, witnesses say, some of them have turned pretty ugly. Najib had to step in to cancel one that Mahathir had called on May 13, the 41st anniversary of the 1969 riots that brought about the NEP in the first place. That rally now is to be revived for June 14. Originally expected to draw 10,000 Malays in a state of ferment that resembles the Tea Parties in the United States, the rally is now expected to draw double that. The 84-year-old Mahathir is expected to be the keynote speaker.

The premier is aware that Mahathir’s implacable enmity played a major role in bringing down Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Although Najib’s public approval rating is now 68 percent, up from a disastrous 44 percent when he took office, he faces the possibility of rivals in UMNO if he pushes too hard – including his deputy prime minister, Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also the deputy president of UMNO.

Najib has repeatedly vowed to clean up corruption in UMNO, which has abysmal public approval ratings, according to an April survey by the respected Merdeka Center, a Kuala Lumpur-based think-tank, and despite his own reputation for questionable contracts when he was minister of defense. The survey found that only 22 percent of Malaysians placed their trust in UMNO, which has largely run the country since its inception. That has been borne out by a long series of by-elections since national polls in March 2008. The Barisan Nasional has lost eight of the 11 by-elections and only won on in Kuala Selangor by a relatively small margin of votes.

Najib has said repeatedly that the country can no longer rely on a few sectors like oil palm plantations and crude oil sales to drive growth, instead calling for diversification and incentives for new strategic industries. The education system – which critics say now gives ethnic Malays virtually blanket passes with little academic rigor – must be reevaluated and improved, he says, to reward excellence and nurture talented graduates who excel in strategic and creative thinking, and entrepreneurial and leadership skills that will drive success in the decades ahead. A flock of bloated state-owned or government linked companies continue to swallow up money – the latest being the plantation giant Sime Darby, which recently reported as much as US$1 billion in writeoffs for bad investments, or the chronically money-losing Proton national car.

But in order to do any of that, he stands a strong chance of alienating his political base – or, in the case of the Proton, Mahathir. He has also demanded an end to practices that support the behavior of rent-seeking and patronage. But doing so would take away a major reason for the existence of UMNO, which is regarded as hopelessly corrupt by a large segment of the population – and thus the 22 percent approval rating for the party.

“Obviously, I as the president of Umno cannot forsake the interests of the Malays who form the majority in Malaysia,” Najib said when closing the Bumiputera Economic Congress organized by the Malay Consultative Council.

As the son of the founder of the New Economic Policy (NEP) the late Abdul Razak Hussein — Malaysia’s second prime minister — in no way would he betray his father’s struggle, he said. However, he didn’t point out to the crowd that when his father and other UMNO leaders implemented the NEP, they designed it to end in 1990.

11 Comments »

  1. Najib’s 10MP.

    Permata Pintar, the pet project of Rosmah Mansor for preschool kids, received RM36.0 million in addition to the RM29.0 million they already received? That will be a whopping RM65.0 million for 900 pintar kids.

    More than RM3.0 billion cash in the coffer of Felda had already dwindled to a mere RM200.0 million in over 2 years ever since Najib took over personally! Are Malaysians so naive to believe that each Pintar kid needed RM72,000 for kindy study?? It blew my mind! Wake up Malaysians. We already knew who was the main beneficiary of the NS project and that was another whopping RM500.0 million a year vanished into Rosmah’s pocket.

    Comment by Mata Kuching — June 13, 2010 @ 8:28 PM | Reply

  2. This is the kind of logical and intelligent reasoning which Malaysians should appreciate. Hope more will express their views on our current pathetic state of financial mismanagement.

    Did Idris Jala ask the right question?
    Shinliang
    Jun 10, 10
    1:45pm
    Years of debate training taught me one thing: you can trap your opponents by asking the right question. For example, if I asked, ‘Would you prefer your country to go bankrupt or for your subsidies to cut?’ The reasonable answer is rather obvious for if I said I would rather the country to go bankrupt I will look like a selfish bastard.

    But this was exactly the question that our minister, Idris Jala and PM, Najib posed to Malaysians a week ago. They asked us to choose between being a selfish bastard or a ‘noble’ countrymen.

    But if I rephrase the question into, ‘Would you rather have your subsidies cut, or stop corruption and wasteful government spending in order to save the country from going bankrupt?’ Then, suddenly, we are not so sure anymore that refusing subsidies cut is a selfish thing to do.

    Any successful businessman will tell you that ‘you reap profit not by saving money but by investing it.’ What good is it if we are able to save all the money in the world if it is not meant for investing in a better future? Perhaps this is a good time to reflect on our major government spending spree and see how the ROI (return on investment) looks like.

    From the Multimedia Super Corridor, Sepang Formula 1 Circuit, Bakun Hydro Dam to the hundreds of low-cost housing development areas, how many of these actually reaped concrete returns to the people of Malaysia?

    As if to add salt to the wound, recently we purchased state-of-the-art submarines that cannot submerge (and once submerged would never emerge) and 257 armoured vehicles at RM31 million each. What is the ROI for these?

    And to my shock, I stumbled onto a 2005 Nature journal paper titled, ‘Malaysian biotechnology: The valley of ghosts’ which claimed that the government had spent US$160 million building a biotechnology hub in Malaysia but it failed, miserably. Although I understand that the building of this hub is still a ‘work-in-progress’, how would any world-class bio-technology researcher want to work in Malaysia after this revelation by Nature, one of the most influential journals in the world? What is the ROI for this?

    Would the subsidy cut succeed in saving Malaysia from bankruptcy if implemented as a stand-alone policy? The answer is a straight ‘no’. In the recent sub-prime financial crisis, many countries in the West have had a bail-out plan, tightened loan requirements and also had their subsidies/welfare cut.

    But they knew that this was just a temporary mitigation plan. Their long-term strategy was to restructure the way banks work. So do we have a similar long-term strategy? Or is cutting the subsidies our ‘long-term’ strategy?

    Let there be no doubt that we Malaysians have been enjoying a whole range of subsidies since we were born. And I totally agree with Idris Jala that Malaysians are one of the most heavily subsidised citizens in the world. But the question that goes a-begging here would be: where did we go wrong?

    Was it the 1997 Asian financial crisis? Was it the 2001 burst of the IT bubble? Was it the recent sub-prime financial crisis? Could the government be giving a false impression to us for past decades by keeping the subsidies high, the inflation low and fueling the economy with debts?

    It is not possible that the years of economic boom under the leadership of Dr Mahathir Mohamad was just a mirage after all?

    BN knows very well that they cannot do a drastic subsidy cut. It will increase the inflation that will kill off the economy as well as any chance they have in the next general election to regain their two-thirds majority. So they may just keep the subsidies. Here comes the scary part – would the government continue to drive the economy with the current failed strategy despite knowing that Malaysia will go bankrupt?

    And mind you, when we say the country goes bankrupt it doesn’t mean everyone becomes dirt poor, but only the middle working class like you and me. I personally believe that BN will continue with the ‘bankrupt strategy’ because (1) BN ministers have an abundance of wealth far beyond the reach of middle working class like you and me and (2) most of them own a ‘back up’ property in Australia.

    I have absolutely no grudge in paying more taxes and in accepting the reduced subsidies from the government provided that I know the money that I help save is well spent. But not only is my confidence in government policy lacking, so is the general public’s.

    There is no way a subsidy cut is going to work, not if the government doesn’t first show their commitment in combating corruption and wasteful spending. And no, I’m not talking about the MACC action against the guilty ones amounting to only few thousand ringgit. We wouldn’t be going bankrupt just for that amount of corruption.

    Comment by Mata Kuching — June 10, 2010 @ 7:24 PM | Reply

  3. “However, PM Najib didn’t point out to the crowd that when his father and other UMNO leaders implemented the NEP, they designed it to end in 1990.”

    It’s purely greed that is driving the Malay Consultative Council to demand PM Najib to keep the essence of NEP in NEM.

    Apparently they also lack the confidence to compete on level playing field with the rest of the ‘rakyat’.

    How long do they think they can survive in this borderless world if they still want to hold on to their crutches ?

    So sad and pitiful for these ‘jaguh kampung’.

    Comment by PH Chin — June 6, 2010 @ 4:57 PM | Reply

  4. I think Najib is going to be the last PM for UMNO/BN regime in Malaysia. I tell u he’s the worst PM we can have for he’s alot of baggage to carry. He’s his stupid 1Malaysia, his dracula wife rosmah mansor having 70 millions allocation for not even having a fortfolio in a cabinet, wonders in Malaysia the bolehland. He also has the Attantuya murder still cracking his head, the scorpene 500 millions corruption, the RMAF fighter jets engines stolen n sold to Latin Americans, the latest judi bola license for Berjaya Groups, promises during by-elections throughout the countries which haven’t delivered. What’s worst, the promises to the electorates in Batang Ai, by-election in March 2009 n many others have not been delivered. Ur r a real great liar n ur the number one liar or 1Liar in 1Malaysia. God Allah SWT will know what to do with u during life after death in the barzah.

    Comment by Minda Mandol — June 6, 2010 @ 12:41 PM | Reply

    • Minda, Najib shall be the last PM of UMNO controlled BN. UMNO and BN shall remain an Opposition for a long time if they are not good at executing check and balance.

      Comment by Mata Kuching — June 13, 2010 @ 8:33 PM | Reply

  5. MM is a dajal. He’ll not repent. This is the problem with who’s tamak n rakus for power. There’s no end to it. So u see what AB is. He’s a truely a political retiree. Najib, the najis is truely the endroad of UMNO/BN. We got to really mean to ensure that UMNO/BN regime must be ended come this PRU13. The two East Malaysians states Sarawak n Sabah must vote out BN. The more u support UMNO/BN u’ll be more being mistreated. Assurance is given by Pakatan Rakyat that both Sarawak n Sabah will be equal partners as enshrined in the early Agreement in the formation of Malaysia 47 yrs ago. Can’t we see what happenings are around us. We ‘ll get our share in Oil n gas royalty as equal partners. Are we not prepare to get back what’s due to us all these yrs.

    We all better prepare ourselves to just forget what UMNO/BN is all about. They’re not serious to help us in Sarawak n Sabah. What they only want is just to ensure that they’re in power. They’ll promise this n that but they never fulfil all these promises. They’re all dajals.

    Comment by Minda Mandol — June 6, 2010 @ 7:21 AM | Reply

    • “Sarawak n Sabah will be equal partners as enshrined in the early Agreement in the formation of Malaysia 47 yrs ago. Can’t we see what happenings are around us. We ‘ll get our share in Oil n gas royalty as equal partners. Are we not prepare to get back what’s due to us all these yrs”

      Yes….dotn we want to get back what’s due to us? Sarawakian…Sabahan???

      Petronas made RM48 Billion from MLNG Bintulu 2008/2009……what did we get from the UMNO/BN govt… not even a proper road going MLNG….everyday you have to deal with the traffic jammed…

      In Miri…. no use driving into the Miri Old town/City area..you be caught in Traffic jammed….

      Where as in West Malaysia….they have North-South, East-West, East-North….you name it…they have it all…Bridges.. flyovers…trains…. ONLY one road they can not build…ROAD TO HEAVEN…

      Reason given to Sarawak/Sabah…was no or not enough Budget! Whereas they can allocate…what 70 million to this big hair fat short lady R???

      Comment by Anak Sarawak... — June 6, 2010 @ 1:46 PM | Reply

      • Last thing I heard, Sarawak Govt was supposed to have taken some 15% stake in MLNG. That’s some RM8 billion !!!

        Taib will never tell us what he did with the money. If you do, you get thrown out of DUN.

        Taib should be dragged before some oversight Parliamentary committee or something. The State Secretary and the State Police all do his bidding without batting an eyelid.

        Comment by Watcha — June 7, 2010 @ 2:50 PM | Reply

  6. With MM in the fray, there is nothing Najib can do. Infact, Najib is a mere puppet to MM. It is indeed a terrible mistake for Najib to allow MM back into the political lime light. He has his own reasons to allow MM back. Had he continued with TAAB’s direction, there will be no Perkasa, no MM and Najib will be in a position to restore the slide in the country’s economy.

    Now, everything is lost, because MM is determined to ensure his son becomes the next PM after Najib. So, it will be useless for Najib, whatever he wants to do good will never materialize, as MM is determined to use the race card for his son’s political future at whatever cost.

    The only way is for our East Malaysians, to please wake up and present PR with 35 parliamentary seats and make the changes for Malaysia and for our future generations. Powers cannot be vested in the hands of a few families. We are a democracy. We must ensure the bad practices stop.

    Together we hope, but, together we can make a huge difference.

    Comment by Osama — June 6, 2010 @ 12:42 AM | Reply

    • For the sake of open discussion…A few people might blame Anwar for having joined UMNO when in all probability he would have been something of a PAS leader.

      We now see after Sibu, how Malaysians have slowly begun to live and love again. You could look back wistfully, not in anger, but maybe some humility, that had he not, we might have been somewhere today. No, it would not be solely Anwar per se (guy is just like many Malaysians), but the dynamics of whats happening today that could have there in those past yestedays – a catalysis only possible in a society not steeped in dogmas.

      You might regret that in past geopolitics world powers shaded and divided the globe amongst themselves and unabashedly Balfour declared :

      “…In Palestine, we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the present inhabitants of the country [Israel]…The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in agelong tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land…” – Robert Lacey, Hutchinson & Co., 1981

      While Mahathir glares and rants now, to setting himself up for June 14 (May 13 event having been cancelled) he would then take the pulpit, and relive that very same arrogance that Balfour propounded. For in the very belief some Malaysians chastise, it is the very same belief they continue to relive under some guise. Will he?

      Interesting to read what the new Brit government now says it wants to do, conservatively in plain English :

      “…The country has got an overdraft. The interest on that overdraft is swallowing up things that the nation should otherwise be spending money on. We have got to take people with us on this difficult journey…” Cameron, BBChttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/politics/10247504.stm

      Najib has to tel us triumphantly with some alphabets, like NKRA’s, 1Malaysia, regretful phrases “Wa salah Lu mai kong” instead of “Assalamu ‘alaikum”.

      Peace to all Malaysians ! 😀

      Comment by Watcha — June 6, 2010 @ 12:41 PM | Reply

  7. Why won’t Najib put it before an UMNO EGM?

    Why do kris sparring with Ibrahim Ali ? He’s not an UMNO member. Mahathir can confront it at the EGM. He’s a member. If the NGOs want a direct say, join UMNO lah!

    Comment by Watcha — June 6, 2010 @ 12:37 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a reply to Watcha Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.