Hornbill Unleashed

May 19, 2013

10 things Anwar must do

Filed under: Politics — Hornbill Unleashed @ 12:01 AM
Tags: , , ,

P Gunasegaram

By now the cabinet has been appointed and while there are fresh faces, no one I have spoken to expects any drastic changes from the norm especially as Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak is bound to face pressure from Umno delegates at the forthcoming Umno general assembly.

We seem to be going from one election to another and delaying much needed change accordingly. And as everyone knows by now, Umno delegates don’t at all represent the common voice of the Malays but posture to make it appear as if they do.

Thus it was that when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi got a massive mandate from the people in the 2004 elections, obtaining over 90 percent of parliamentary seats, he refrained from taking measures he promised because his advisers told him there will be a backlash from Umno delegates.

Ah, well, history repeats itself, especially when you don’t learn from it, and one can expect the pressures from within Umno to stop any push towards major change which will benefit the country as a whole without descending into the morass of race, religion and language.

NONEFor Pakatan Rakyat, very much still in opposition, the fight continues in earnest. But if it wants to wrest Putrajaya from Barisan Nasional, there are a number of things it has to do and its de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim will have to bear these in mind.

Pakatan would have made much more headway in the elections just past if they had focused on even half of this. But no matter, there is always still time and it is necessary to build on the gains if Malaysians are to see the two-party system emerge.

To my mind, a two-party system emerges only when there has been at least one change of power. That has not happened yet and here is our list of 10 things that Anwar must do if he wants a fair chance of Pakatan forming the next government.

This follows upon our list of 10 things that Najib must do if he wants BN to win again which we highlighted last week.

1. Accept the election results or challenge it in court soon

The elections are over. We all know about election fraud. If there is any, pull out the evidence and take it to the courts. Or forever remain silent and move on to the future. Yes, by all means take steps to stop gerrymandering if you can but there is no point lamenting endlessly that some constituencies have many times the number of constituents than others. Take over government and change that.

2. Stop the 505 rallies

johor black rally 160513 1There is no point going around the country complaining about election fraud now. If it’s the intention to  mobilise effort, it is much better to do so later when Pakatan has reorganised itself along the lines we have suggested. Then it will serve a purpose because you can tell the people what Pakatan is going to be doing in terms of the next elections and get their buy-in and support.

3. Focus on the next election

The question on most people’s lips post-election is: What now for Pakatan? How is it going to win the next election? That’s what the focus should be for Pakatan – the next election and how it plans to win it. Obviously it can’t win without support from Sabah or Sarawak and obviously it can’t win without more support from rural areas in peninsular Malaysia. That will be the two points Pakatan must address plus hold on to current seats.

4. Devise a strategy for Sabah and Sarawak

azlanClearly the Sabah and Sarawak strategy is not so great. Contesting under the banners of peninsular parties in the eastern states is a recipe for disaster outside of the handful of highly urbanised areas. There is a great need for grassroots organisation and for people who can work that. That can come only from local people and local parties.

Pakatan needs to find such people and parties, not easy, yes, but impossible to make inroads otherwise. They wasted five years earlier, better not waste another five.

Here’s something that can be promised Sabah and Sarawak if Pakatan comes to power – a deputy prime minister (say two-and-a-half years each) from the two states.

5. Think about reaching out more to the rural areas

Yes, BN won with less than the popular vote, yes Pakatan had the majority of votes but everyone knows about rural seats being smaller in terms of number of constituents. It’s been that way always with changes to the federal constitution to make the difference worse.

So what is Pakatan doing to get the rural vote? Bad government is out as Kedah has shown. PKR needs to work the ground much more, while DAP and PAS need to widen their appeal to different communities instead of steadfastly remaining in their own pockets of strength. If rural votes are over-represented it makes good strategic sense to go and put more efforts there.

6. Announce the candidates list for the next election now

Pakatan needs drastic change too. Why not make the bold and unprecedented move of announcing their entire slate of candidates – state and parliamentary seats – say six months from now and by as much as four-and-a-half years before the next election. That will give all their candidates a long enough time to work the constituency and for the aspiring wakil rakyat to shake hands with his constituents at least once before elections.

Imagine the kind of competitive advantage that a move like that will give Pakatan and the kind of opportunity to work the ground, which will be the key determinant of the results of the next election.

7. Announce a full shadow cabinet at federal and state level

Follow up number six above with an announcement of the full state and federal cabinet line-up, including for prime minister and deputy prime minister/s and chief ministers. That is a fantastic way to keep the current government in check by offering constructive criticism, suggestions and where necessary brickbats for measures that may be taken.

That also signals to the general public that there is enough cohesiveness in the opposition coalition to form a viable, reasonable government. Do these two within six months.

8. Spell out in one clear voice how you will be different

Really, we can’t have PAS saying it wants an Islamic state and hudud and DAP talking of a Malaysian Malaysia. Focus on the common things that everyone wants and think about what it is the people themselves want. And think about what is right and wrong from a moral and ethical point of view. Evolve this common platform, everyone stick with it and move on and away from these contentious issues between the coalition partners.

The trick is to take a common stance on substantive issues and where there is little likelihood of a change in positions, simply compromise. PAS is not likely to get hudud and the official religion will be Islam nevertheless – just live with that. To go into an election with mixed messages is dangerous for everyone.

9. Make a clear stance on corruption and education

NONEAfter the last election, Anwar promised to overthrow an elected government with a majority of 28 seats by getting frogs to jump parties. That’s clearly wrong. Take a firm stance against both criminal and moral corruption and stick with it come what may. The moral compass must always point in the right direction.

Similarly, education is not to be played around with for political purposes as has been done in the past. Indications are clear that most Malaysians want the quality of English to improve, for instance. Yet, Pakatan has not supported the teaching of Maths and Science in English in a clear concession to pressure groups. Good education must not be compromised for political expediency.

10. Work with the government where you can

There are times when the government does good things. There is much to support in the government and economic transformation programmes. Where it is good, there is no harm but every benefit in supporting it wholeheartedly.

Pakatan should seek to work together with the government actively and cultivate good relations with the federal government for the benefit of the three states it controls. So long as it does not compromise on its own, hopefully high ideals and principles, that should be fine.

If Pakatan assiduously puts these suggestions into practice, then it has a better than even chance of winning the next time around, especially if Najib does nothing about his list of 10.

9 Comments »

  1. ” …….hasrat Anwar pada 17 Ogos 2012 untuk mengundur diri daripada dunia politik dan memilih menjadi pensyarah.

    Hasrat Ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh itu tersebar melalui laman YouTube yang dirakam dalam program Borak Anwar.

    Sementara itu, tambah Nordin, janji Anwar untuk mengundur diri itu sebenarnya hanya mainan politik semata-mata untuk menarik simpati rakyat.

    “Anwar memang pandai berlakon, malah beliau juga cukup licik dan sentiasa mencari alasan atas setiap perbuatannya. Itulah sikap Anwar yang perlu disedari rakyat negara ini terutama para penyokongnya,” katanya.

    Presiden Kelab Wartawan Muda Malaysia (KWMM), Dzulkarnain Taib (gambar) pula berpendapat, keengganan Anwar mengundur diri sudah dijangka jika dilihat daripada pemBOHONGan yang dilakukannya sebelum ini kepada rakyat.

    Dzulkarnain yang merupakan bekas Ketua Pengarang Suara Keadilan itu menambah, janjinya untuk membentuk kerajaan pada 16 September 2008 merupakan pembohongan terbesarnya kepada rakyat.

    “Anwar sepatutnya tidak layak memegang sebarang jawatan politik atau Ketua Pembangkang di Parlimen,” katanya.

    “Anwar tidak mempunyai integriti. Beliau sendiri tidak mampu bercakap benar, bagaimana mampu menjadi pemimpin kepada rakyat, jauh sekali untuk sebagai Perdana Menteri,” katanya.

    Ujar Dzulkarnain, Anwar boleh dianggap sebagai individu yang kemaruk inginkan jawatan Perdana Menteri jika dilihat sikapnya yang seringkali menyalahkan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) atas kegagalan pakatan pembangkang dalam PRU-13.

    “Dia ingat rakyat kini menyokong perjuangannya itu berdasarkan kehadiran ribuan penonton dalam setiap ceramah yang dihadirinya.

    “Namun, sebaliknya berlaku kerana rakyat kini bijak dan majoriti membuat keputusan mahukan Najib kekal sebagai Perdana Menteri. Anwar perlu akur dengan suara rakyat tersebut dan patut berundur,” katanya….

    from:
    http://empayar-pemuda.blogspot.com/2013/05/hot-kerana-anwar-malu-dia-terpaksa.html

    Comment by shina — May 20, 2013 @ 11:42 PM | Reply

  2. CLEARLY PAKATAN STRATEGY IN SABAH & SARAWAK IS DIVISIVE!

    “Clearly the Sabah and Sarawak strategy is not so great. Contesting under the banners of peninsular parties in the eastern states is a recipe for disaster outside of the handful of highly urbanised areas”

    This is an accurate observation.

    Sarawakians and more so the Sabahans have shown that they want to take back control of their politics. They don’t want the second invasion wave by the Malayan opposition after the first wave invasion by UMNO to take over our countries!

    Malaya did not only annexed Sarawak and Sabah under the Malaysia scheme in 1963 but has by stealth been taking control of the internal politics of the 2 countries.

    Loyal Sabahans have fiercely resisted the next wave invasion of Malayans after UMNO took over the Sabah government to reinforce its control and plunder of that country since 1995.

    In the Sabah elections Pakatan deliberately split the votes in Sabah to deny the STAR and SAPP parties from gaining seats so they can champion the “autonomy” issue and embarrass the Malayans in the foreign Malayan parliament.

    In Sarawak we know the answer. There is no real Sarawak opposition. How can there be any when the opposition are only branches of Malayan parties?

    In Sabah the campaign was to oppose “parti parti Malaya” from coming into Sabah.

    In Sarawak they were welcomed with open arms. Such is the pathetic state of Sarawak politics! It is a shame that Sarawak politicians do not have legs to stand up.

    Sabahans want to stand up for themselves and demand that Malaya honour the 20 Points Agreement which was an international Treaty with Malaya containing the terms and condition for formation of Malaysia. This was one of the main idea for having strong Sabah parties to defend Sabah.

    PM Najib has declared these Points Agreements are intact but we know that all the terms have only been honoured in the breach.

    It was not their intention to honour such a an agreement just as much as Tunku Abdul Rahman had declared “Malaya would never colonise Sabah and Sarawak but they will be treated as equal partners”!

    50 years on can any one confirm that these words have been honoured?

    Sarawak has a similar 18 Points Agreement with Malaya as the terms and conditions for forming Malaysia. But like Malayans our “leaders” do not seem to care about enforcing what is our Charter of Rights.

    It is great to fight for NCR land rights etc in court. but there is no visible organising of the people in the urban areas to unite with the ulu and the various tribes to unite to fight foreign domination by Malaya.

    In fact it would not be to Pakatan’s agenda to have this happening if it gets into power. Its policies still see Sarawak and Sabah as reserve banks, oil banks and resources centres. They also want all these to develop Malaya. Like what Mahathir said large parts of Sarawak and Sabah still have potential unexploited resources.

    So can Sarawak or Sabah ever get Malaya to honour the Points Agreement?

    It will only happen if patriotic people unite as one to make that demand. Elections are one way to convey this message but the Sarawak politicians are not pursuing this opportunity as they have done in Sabah. They are subjugated by Malayan parties. The weak election campaign confirm this.

    It is also one reason why Pakatan wanted to split the votes- to weaken and suppress the voice of independence.

    We can support the Malayan Opposition’s effort to overthrow of UMNO power but it does not mean we should sacrifice our position and not build up strong Sarawak parties to defend Sarawak.

    To be used by Malayan parties is to be used by them for their power games and Sarawak will be the casualty.

    Think about our Sarawak first!

    Comment by SARAWAKIANS — May 19, 2013 @ 5:21 PM | Reply

    • Yours was a dinosaur observation. Legally Malaysia was illegal after Singapore was sacked in 1965. No Sarawakians and Sabahans wanted to withdraw from Malaysia when they could have. So why now? How was Pakatan strategy in Sabah and Sarawak divisive when BN ‘s was not? PBB, SUPP, PRS and SPDP and previously PBDS and SNAP are all 100% local or Sarawak based parties. Did Sarawakians and Sarawak achieve the same success level as Singapore with all these parties under the control of Tun Abdul Rahman Yacub and now Taib Mahmud? Both uncle and nephew and their family members are billionaires. Who do you have in mind to build up strong Sarawak parties to defend Sarawak and from what? Who have been plundering Sarawak? PAS, DAP and PKR????

      Comment by Bidayuh Headmaster — May 19, 2013 @ 10:36 PM | Reply

    • Your Sarawakia was cheated by your own leader. Those cronies like Tahi mahmud is same gang with BN racist cronies. They will only dig money and keep as much money as possible. When come to the worst, they will run away and enjoy good life in other country. Just like our aiyoyo minister, Samyvellu A/L Gudit Pariah, now enjoy in India.

      Comment by Mike-Johor — May 20, 2013 @ 3:29 PM | Reply

  3. The writer who has never experienced and gone through what Anwar did since his sacking as deputy PM can only talk but dares not join any party in PR to fight for justice and against corruption, racism and cronyism. Who does not know how to list down the 10 or even 100 things that he wants others to do while he hides under his bed when the police cracks down on Opposition leaders.

    Comment by Patricia Linggam — May 19, 2013 @ 3:14 PM | Reply

    • Tak Guna betul budak itu tetapi nama dia Guna !

      Comment by Shukri — May 19, 2013 @ 5:01 PM | Reply

  4. Clearly the Sabah and Sarawak strategy is not so great. Contesting under the banners of peninsular parties in the eastern states is a recipe for disaster outside of the handful of highly urbanised areas.

    This observation is flawed and the suggestion of using “local” parties shows the political ignorance of the writer. Local parties contesting against BN in the last Sarawak state election and the just concluded general election gathered less than 100,000 votes. Rural voters are ready for the two party system but BN election machinery in rural areas were far more superior and it was much easier for BN to cheat and use money politic effectively in rural areas. With many young and new rural voters who did not come home from other places to vote it was a mystery how the voters turnout could exceed 70% and with some areas exceeding 80% where Pakatan was making strong impact. Yet most BN candidates in rural areas won by a majority of between 4,000 to 10,000. These constituencies are among the poorest and least developed in Sarawak. How do we explain that? Some frustrated locals even remarked that even if BN put a dog or monkey as candidate they will still win.

    Pakatan Rakyat election machinery must be very vigilant and effective in stopping electoral frauds in rural constituencies to have a fair chance of winning. It must also ensure young voters working in other towns and far from their home must be brought back to vote. For the Opposition, election preparations including new voters registration, checking of electoral rolls, identifying phantom voters and more importantly the selection of potential candidates for rural constituencies must start at least 2 to 3 years ahead.

    Comment by Mata Kuching — May 19, 2013 @ 8:08 AM | Reply

    • I could not agree more with you Mata Kuching. Pakatan Rakyat need to weed out phantom voters and cheating in rural constituencies. SUPP and BN had cheated in Sibu and Lanang parliamentary seats many times in the past but DAP election machinery was a lot smarter this time in minimising frauds and cheating in these two constituencies. The Christian community in Sibu should also be congratulated for being strong spiritually and for rejecting corruption and money politics outright.

      Comment by Richard Lee — May 19, 2013 @ 2:05 PM | Reply

    • Many ballots marked for PR ended up in BN boxes and in many form 14 the votes did not tally. The Election Observers are sleeping throughout the process.

      Comment by SK Subramaniam — May 21, 2013 @ 11:36 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.